Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> Max wrote:
>
> > If I run this with loops=1 then everything works fine. If I use a
> > number greater than 1 then I get the error. Is there a method call
> > that I need to restore the requestor object to a condition where it's
> > eligible to receive another response?
>
>
Max wrote:
> If I run this with loops=1 then everything works fine. If I use a
> number greater than 1 then I get the error. Is there a method call
> that I need to restore the requestor object to a condition where it's
> eligible to receive another response?
I'm pretty sure that to get a new r