On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:08:27 -0400, geremy condra wrote:
I have written Haskell that runs faster than C, and Forth that runs
faster than C,
Faster than *what* C, though?
With Haskell, there's seldom a significant performance hit for using
-fvia-C, so you would probably have been able to get
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 7:11 AM, Nobody nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:08:27 -0400, geremy condra wrote:
I have written Haskell that runs faster than C, and Forth that runs
faster than C,
Faster than *what* C, though?
Well, than the C it was replacing, which is admittedly
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 21:52 -0500, Peng Yu wrote:
http://psyco.sourceforge.net/
The above package can improve python program on 32 bit library. But I
need to run on 64 bit library. Is there any other module that can help
improving the performance of python on 64 bit?
As I understand it,
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Tim Wintle tim.win...@teamrubber.com wrote:
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 21:52 -0500, Peng Yu wrote:
http://psyco.sourceforge.net/
The above package can improve python program on 32 bit library. But I
need to run on 64 bit library. Is there any other module that can
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Peng Yu pengyu...@gmail.com wrote:
http://psyco.sourceforge.net/
The above package can improve python program on 32 bit library. But I
need to run on 64 bit library. Is there any other module that can help
improving the performance of python on 64 bit?
This
On 25/06/2010 16:34, Stephen Hansen wrote:
Python's slow, sure. But its in practice fast enough for an extremely broad
range of activities.
What?
Kindest regards.
Mark Lawrence.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.ukwrote:
On 25/06/2010 16:34, Stephen Hansen wrote:
Python's slow, sure. But its in practice fast enough for an extremely
broad
range of activities.
What?
What, what?
--S
--
On 25/06/2010 22:25, Stephen Hansen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Mark Lawrencebreamore...@yahoo.co.ukwrote:
On 25/06/2010 16:34, Stephen Hansen wrote:
Python's slow, sure. But its in practice fast enough for an extremely
broad
range of activities.
What?
What, what?
--S
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.ukwrote:
On 25/06/2010 22:25, Stephen Hansen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Mark Lawrencebreamore...@yahoo.co.uk
wrote:
On 25/06/2010 16:34, Stephen Hansen wrote:
Python's slow, sure. But its in practice fast
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On 25/06/2010 22:25, Stephen Hansen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Mark
Lawrencebreamore...@yahoo.co.ukwrote:
On 25/06/2010 16:34, Stephen Hansen wrote:
Python's slow, sure. But its in practice fast
10 matches
Mail list logo