On May 2, 4:54 am, Duncan Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> chrisber<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ...it leaves me
> > wonderfing whether there would have been another clean way to allow
> > both my test code and unittest to have options without interfering
> > with one another.
>
> You can pass a
chrisber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've poked around to see if I could delete the options my earlier code
> consumed from the commandline buffer, before invoking unittest, but
> that seems klugy. Instead, I hardwired in a testing config file name,
> that always has to be local. That works pret
