King writes:
>> Why is it easier than the above mentioned - they are *there* (except the
>> custom xml), and just can be used. What don't they do you want to do?
>>
>> Other than that, and even security issues put aside, I don't see much
>> difference between pickle and python code, except the la
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:26 AM, King wrote:
>> Why is it easier than the above mentioned - they are *there* (except the
>> custom xml), and just can be used. What don't they do you want to do?
>>
>> Other than that, and even security issues put aside, I don't see much
>> difference between pickl
> Why is it easier than the above mentioned - they are *there* (except the
> custom xml), and just can be used. What don't they do you want to do?
>
> Other than that, and even security issues put aside, I don't see much
> difference between pickle and python code, except the latter being more
> ve
King schrieb:
I have looked upon various object serialization de-serialization
techniques.
(shelve, pickle, anydbm, custom xml format etc.) What I personally
feel that instead of all these
methods for saving the objects it would be easier to save the data as
python scripts itself.
In this case, l
