Re: pylint scores

2010-08-06 Thread Matteo Landi
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 12:27 PM, News123 wrote: > Hi, > > > On 07/31/2010 11:04 AM, Matteo Landi wrote: >> What are the messages one should really care about while evaluating >> its code using pylint? It's easy to get 5 scored with a "lot of public >> methods" or bad named variables such as 'x' or

Re: pylint scores

2010-08-01 Thread News123
Hi, On 07/31/2010 11:04 AM, Matteo Landi wrote: > What are the messages one should really care about while evaluating > its code using pylint? It's easy to get 5 scored with a "lot of public > methods" or bad named variables such as 'x' or 'y' .. Have you got any > config file to share? The mos

Re: pylint scores

2010-07-31 Thread Matteo Landi
What are the messages one should really care about while evaluating its code using pylint? It's easy to get 5 scored with a "lot of public methods" or bad named variables such as 'x' or 'y' .. Have you got any config file to share? On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 2:48 AM, Dan Stromberg wrote: > > On Fri,

Re: pylint scores

2010-07-30 Thread Dan Stromberg
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 12:18 PM, News123 wrote: > On 07/30/2010 03:12 PM, wheres pythonmonks wrote: > > I am starting to use pylint to look at my code and I see that it gives a > rating. > > What values do experienced python programmers get on code not > > targeting the benchmark? > > > > I wrot

Re: pylint scores

2010-07-30 Thread News123
On 07/30/2010 03:12 PM, wheres pythonmonks wrote: > I am starting to use pylint to look at my code and I see that it gives a > rating. > What values do experienced python programmers get on code not > targeting the benchmark? > > I wrote some code, tried to keep it under 80 characters per line, >

Re: pylint scores

2010-07-30 Thread Peter Otten
wheres pythonmonks wrote: > I am starting to use pylint to look at my code and I see that it gives a > rating. What values do experienced python programmers get on code not > targeting the benchmark? > > I wrote some code, tried to keep it under 80 characters per line, > reasonable variable names