In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Colin J. Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
.
.
.
>Your point about iterators is well taken, but it seems that the range is
>used sufficiently frequently that some syntactic form would be helpf
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> Colin J. Williams wrote:
>
>> One of the little irritants of Python is that the range syntax is rather
>> long-winded:
>> [Dbg]>>> range(3, 20, 6)
>> [3, 9, 15]
>> [Dbg]>>>
>> It would be nice if one could have something like 3:20:6.
>
> if you find yourself using range a
On 2006-11-10, Roberto Bonvallet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Colin J. Williams wrote:
>> One of the little irritants of Python is that the range syntax is rather
>> long-winded:
>> [Dbg]>>> range(3, 20, 6)
>> [3, 9, 15]
>> [Dbg]>>>
>> It would be nice if one could have something like 3:20:6.
>
>
Colin J. Williams wrote:
> One of the little irritants of Python is that the range syntax is rather
> long-winded:
> [Dbg]>>> range(3, 20, 6)
> [3, 9, 15]
> [Dbg]>>>
> It would be nice if one could have something like 3:20:6.
if you find yourself using range a lot, maybe you should check if you
Colin J. Williams wrote:
> One of the little irritants of Python is that the range syntax is rather
> long-winded:
> [Dbg]>>> range(3, 20, 6)
> [3, 9, 15]
> [Dbg]>>>
> It would be nice if one could have something like 3:20:6.
In that case, how would the parser know which colon terminates the
'for
