Simon Forman wrote:
...
I usually use this with assert statements when I need to check a
sequence. Rather than:
for something in something_else: assert expression
I say
assert False not in (expression for something in something_else)
This way the whole assert statement will be removed if
On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 04:45:35 -0700, manstey wrote:
Hi,
I often use:
a='yy'
tup=('x','yy','asd')
if a in tup:
...
but I can't find an equivalent code for:
a='xfsdfyysd asd x'
tup=('x','yy','asd')
if tup in a:
...
Of course you can't. Strings don't contain tuples, since
You can get the matching elements with a list comprehension with
something like
py a='xfsdfyysd asd x'
py tup=('x','yy','asd')
py [x for x in tup if x in a.split()]
['x', 'asd']
Hope this helps
manstey wrote:
Hi,
I often use:
a='yy'
tup=('x','yy','asd')
if a in tup:
...
but I can't
manstey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but I can't find an equivalent code for:
a='xfsdfyysd asd x'
tup=('x','yy','asd')
if tup in a:
...
I can only do:
if 'x' in a or 'yy' in a or 'asd' in a:
...
but then I can't make the if clause dependent on changing value of tup.
Is there a way
I know I can do it this way. I wanted to know if there was another way.
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
manstey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but I can't find an equivalent code for:
a='xfsdfyysd asd x'
tup=('x','yy','asd')
if tup in a:
...
I can only do:
if 'x' in a or 'yy' in a or
manstey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know I can do it this way. I wanted to know if there was another way.
if you don't want to write Python programs, why are you using Python ?
/F
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
manstey wrote:
Hi,
I often use:
a='yy'
tup=('x','yy','asd')
if a in tup:
...
but I can't find an equivalent code for:
a='xfsdfyysd asd x'
tup=('x','yy','asd')
if tup in a:
...
I can only do:
if 'x' in a or 'yy' in a or 'asd' in a:
...
but then I can't make the if
