John Nagle na...@animats.com wrote:
It would be un-Pythonic to have real concurrency in Python.
You wouldn't be able to patch code running in one thread from
another thread. Some of the dynamic features of Python
would break. If you want fine-grained concurrency, you need
controlled
On 7/1/2012 10:51 AM, dmitrey wrote:
hi all,
are there any information about upcoming availability of parallel
computations in CPython without modules like multiprocessing? I mean
something like parallel for loops, or, at least, something without
forking with copying huge amounts of RAM each
Dan Stromberg, 01.07.2012 21:28:
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Thomas Jollans wrote:
On 07/01/2012 08:44 PM, Dan Stromberg wrote:
IronPython, sadly, lacks a python standard library.
Beg pardon?
If something happens with this for CPython, it'll likely come from Pypy
developers first. They seem to be interested in doing things in a way that
is (or can be made) compatible with CPython. If you want to help them
along, they're taking donations to fund the work, or you could donate your
own
On 07/01/2012 07:51 PM, dmitrey wrote:
hi all,
are there any information about upcoming availability of parallel
computations in CPython without modules like multiprocessing? I mean
something like parallel for loops, or, at least, something without
forking with copying huge amounts of RAM
On 07/01/2012 08:44 PM, Dan Stromberg wrote:
IronPython, sadly, lacks a python standard library.
Beg pardon?
https://github.com/IronLanguages/main/tree/master/External.LCA_RESTRICTED/Languages/IronPython/27/Lib
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 7/1/2012 1:53 PM, Thomas Jollans wrote:
As far as I can tell, there are no concrete plans to integrate
concurrency better, or get rid of the GIL, at the moment. To quote
http://wiki.python.org/moin/GlobalInterpreterLock
Getting rid of the GIL is an occasional topic on the python-dev
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Thomas Jollans t...@jollybox.de wrote:
On 07/01/2012 08:44 PM, Dan Stromberg wrote:
IronPython, sadly, lacks a python standard library.
Beg pardon?
https://github.com/IronLanguages/main/tree/master/External.LCA_RESTRICTED/Languages/IronPython/27/Lib
On 07/01/2012 09:28 PM, Dan Stromberg wrote:
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Thomas Jollans t...@jollybox.de
mailto:t...@jollybox.de wrote:
On 07/01/2012 08:44 PM, Dan Stromberg wrote:
IronPython, sadly, lacks a python standard library.
Beg pardon?
Thomas Jollans t...@jollybox.de wrote:
There is, of course, Stackless Python.
http://stackless.com/
Stackless Python doesn't really address the original poster's problem
as the GIL still effectively limits Python code running in one thread
at a time.
Ross
10 matches
Mail list logo
