On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Dennis Lee Bieber wlfr...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
I don't think that would be efficient, considering that the above
entails what would be something like three or four courses all by
themselves (Database Analysis, Database Design, SQL [these three are
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Dennis Lee Bieber wlfr...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
After the table design is complete you can move to business logic
operations (SQL for standard/fixed actions), along with criteria to
maintain the integrity of the data (foreign key constraints, etc.). This
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Stephen Hansen apt.shan...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 7:15 AM, Victor Subervi victorsube...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Steve Holden st...@holdenweb.com wrote:
But we are now in the realm of theory as far as you are concerned,
Hi;
The following code works fine. I would like you to suggest something more
simple and elegant:
sql = 'select p.ID from %sPackages p join %sCategoriesPackages c where
c.CategoryID=%s;' % (store, store, categoryID)
cursor.execute(sql)
tmp = [itm[0] for itm in cursor]
Your code select some ids from database and list distinct ids in packageIDs.
You can use SELECT DISTINCT in your SQL statement.
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Victor Subervi victorsube...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi;
The following code works fine. I would like you to suggest something more
simple
Victor Subervi wrote:
Hi;
The following code works fine. I would like you to suggest something more
simple and elegant:
sql = 'select p.ID from %sPackages p join %sCategoriesPackages c where
c.CategoryID=%s;' % (store, store, categoryID)
cursor.execute(sql)
tmp = [itm[0] for
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Tim Chase python.l...@tim.thechases.comwrote:
Victor Subervi wrote:
Hi;
The following code works fine. I would like you to suggest something more
simple and elegant:
sql = 'select p.ID from %sPackages p join %sCategoriesPackages c
where
Victor Subervi wrote:
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Tim Chase python.l...@tim.thechases.com
mailto:python.l...@tim.thechases.com wrote:
Victor Subervi wrote:
Hi;
The following code works fine. I would like you to suggest
something more
simple and
En Sat, 09 Jan 2010 11:01:25 -0300, Victor Subervi
victorsube...@gmail.com escribió:
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Tim Chase
python.l...@tim.thechases.comwrote:
It would also help if you didn't pass the categoryID as a
string-formatted
value, but as a proper parameter, something like
And you should use cursor.fetchall() instead of cursor in list
comprehension:
packageIDs = [itm[0] for itm in cursor.fetchall()]
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Gabriel Genellina gagsl-...@yahoo.com.arwrote:
En Sat, 09 Jan 2010 11:01:25 -0300, Victor Subervi
victorsube...@gmail.com escribió:
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Steve Holden st...@holdenweb.com wrote:
But we are now in the realm of theory as far as you are concerned, since
you have already stated several times that you aren't interested in
correcting your design until after you have got the current mess into
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Iuri iurisil...@gmail.com wrote:
And you should use cursor.fetchall() instead of cursor in list
comprehension:
packageIDs = [itm[0] for itm in cursor.fetchall()]
Now, someone else on this list told me the other. Can you explain the
difference?
TIA,
beno
--
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Dennis Lee Bieber wlfr...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 10:28:31 -0500, Victor Subervi
victorsube...@gmail.com declaimed the following in
gmane.comp.python.general:
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Iuri iurisil...@gmail.com wrote:
And you should
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 7:15 AM, Victor Subervi victorsube...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Steve Holden st...@holdenweb.com wrote:
But we are now in the realm of theory as far as you are concerned, since
you have already stated several times that you aren't interested in
14 matches
Mail list logo
