Jens Müller wrote:
> Hi and sorry for double posting - had mailer problems,
>
>> Terry said "queue". not "list". Use the Queue class (it's thread-safe)
>> in the "Queue" module (assuming you're using Python 2.x; in Python 3.x
>> it's called the "queue" module).
>
> Yes yes, I know. I use a queue
Hi and sorry for double posting - had mailer problems,
Terry said "queue". not "list". Use the Queue class (it's thread-safe)
in the "Queue" module (assuming you're using Python 2.x; in Python 3.x
it's called the "queue" module).
Yes yes, I know. I use a queue to realize the thread pool queue,
Le Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:04:56 +0100, Jens Müller a écrit :
>
> Is a list thrad-safe or do I need to lock when adding the results of my
> worker threads to a list? The order of the elements in the list does not
> matter.
The built-in list type is thread-safe, but is doesn't provide the waiting
fea
Jens Müller wrote:
Hello,
The fairly obvious thing to do is use a queue.queue for tasks and another
for results and a pool of threads that read, fetch, and write.
Thanks, indeed.
Is a list thrad-safe or do I need to lock when adding the results of my
worker threads to a list? The order of th
Hello,
The fairly obvious thing to do is use a queue.queue for tasks and another
for results and a pool of threads that read, fetch, and write.
Thanks, indeed.
Is a list thrad-safe or do I need to lock when adding the results of my
worker threads to a list? The order of the elements in the l
Hello,
The fairly obvious thing to do is use a queue.queue for tasks and another
for results and a pool of threads that read, fetch, and write.
Thanks, indeed.
Is a list thrad-safe or do I need to lock when adding the results of my
worker threads to a list? The order of the elements in the li
On 04:22 pm, m...@privacy.net wrote:
Hello,
what would be best practise for speeding up a larger number of http-get
requests done via urllib? Until now they are made in sequence, each
request taking up to one second. The results must be merged into a
list, while the original sequence needs no
On 1/4/2010 11:22 AM, Jens Müller wrote:
Hello,
what would be best practise for speeding up a larger number of http-get
requests done via urllib? Until now they are made in sequence, each
request taking up to one second. The results must be merged into a list,
while the original sequence needs n
Hello,
what would be best practise for speeding up a larger number of http-get
requests done via urllib? Until now they are made in sequence, each request
taking up to one second. The results must be merged into a list, while the
original sequence needs not to be kept.
I think speed could be
