Henrique Dante de Almeida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 19, 10:28?am, Laszlo Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I cannot predict acceptable speed requirements, but I can tell that
there will be some clients downloading 100MB report files from the
server, so I presume that I will need a
- use simple file copying from a mounted network drive
Untrustable clients should not mount out anything from my server. (Also,
it is not a protocol. I need to communicate with a real program, not
just copying files.)
- use http (web server)
I mentioned this before - don't know how to
It is possible to change the serialization used by Pyro
http://pyro.sourceforge.net/manual/9-security.html#pickle
to the the 'gnosis' XML Pickler.
As I said earlier, I would not use XML. Just an example - I need to be
able to transfer image files, word and excel documents. How silly it
I'm trying to write a multi threaded TPC server. I have used xmlrpc
How exactly did you come to the conclusion that your server must be
multi threaded ?
I don't think that it is important. But if you are interested:
- yes, the server will probably be I/O bound, not CPU bound
- I'm
On May 19, 10:28 am, Laszlo Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think that it is important. But if you are interested:
- yes, the server will probably be I/O bound, not CPU bound
- I'm have experience with thread programming, but not with twisted
That part was just to show you that being
Laszlo Nagy wrote:
It is possible to change the serialization used by Pyro
http://pyro.sourceforge.net/manual/9-security.html#pickle
to the the 'gnosis' XML Pickler.
As I said earlier, I would not use XML. Just an example - I need to be
able to transfer image files, word and excel
Hi All,
I'm trying to write a multi threaded TPC server. I have used xmlrpc
before for many purposes, but in this case this would not be efficient:
- I have to send larger amounts of data, the overhead of converting to
XML and parsing XML back would be too much pain
- I have no clue how to
On May 16, 7:16 am, Laszlo Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
Hello, :-)
I'm trying to write a multi threaded TPC server. I have used xmlrpc
How exactly did you come to the conclusion that your server must be
multi threaded ?
- I have to send larger amounts of data, the overhead of
Did you consider gzipping your XML (or YAML) packets ? Would the
transfer time be acceptable in this case ?
That would add even more to the overhead of transcoding the
transportlayer. Switching from XMLRPC to a json-based protocol reduced
in a project of mine reduced the overhead 10-20fold
Laszlo Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to write a multi threaded TPC server. I have used xmlrpc
before for many purposes, but in this case this would not be efficient:
- I have to send larger amounts of data, the overhead of converting to
XML and parsing XML back would be too
On May 16, 9:26 am, Diez B. Roggisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you consider gzipping your XML (or YAML) packets ? Would the
transfer time be acceptable in this case ?
That would add even more to the overhead of transcoding the
transportlayer. Switching from XMLRPC to a json-based
Henrique Dante de Almeida schrieb:
On May 16, 9:26 am, Diez B. Roggisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you consider gzipping your XML (or YAML) packets ? Would the
transfer time be acceptable in this case ?
That would add even more to the overhead of transcoding the
transportlayer. Switching
12 matches
Mail list logo
