On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 11/11/2013 06:50, Rick Johnson wrote:
>>In a nutshell the author attempts to plead for the
>>"longevity" of "old code bases" simply on the basis of his
>>assertion that "old code bases" are "less buggy" and
>>contain more "
I never thought I'd be saying this but welcome back Rick :)
On 11/11/2013 06:50, Rick Johnson wrote:
On Saturday, November 9, 2013 6:42:04 AM UTC-6, Steven
D'Aprano wrote:
Uses an example written in Ruby, but don't
let that put you off:
Why would it? I write Ruby code all the time. Ruby code
On Saturday, November 9, 2013 6:42:04 AM UTC-6, Steven
D'Aprano wrote:
> Uses an example written in Ruby, but don't
> let that put you off:
Why would it? I write Ruby code all the time. Ruby code in
and of itself does not bother me, what bothers me about Ruby
is the ease at which a programmer can
On 09/11/2013 12:42, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Uses an example written in Ruby, but don't let that put you off:
http://raganwald.com/2008/05/narcissism-of-small-code-differences.html
Wonderful read, thanks very much for the link.
--
Python is the second best programming language in the world.
B
Uses an example written in Ruby, but don't let that put you off:
http://raganwald.com/2008/05/narcissism-of-small-code-differences.html
--
Steven
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
