Paul Rubin wrote:
Jp Calderone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Distributing load across multiple machines scales better than
distributing it over multiple CPUs in a single machine. If you have
serious scalability requirements, SMP is a minor step in the wrong
direction (unless you're talking
Hi,
Out of sheer curiosity:
Does Twisted scale if the server has several CPUs?
As far as I know twisted uses one interpreter. This
means a prefork server modul might be better to
server database driven web-apps.
Has anyone experience high load and twisted?
Thomas
--
Thomas Güttler,
On Thu, 19 May 2005 17:22:31 +0200, Thomas Guettler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Out of sheer curiosity:
Does Twisted scale if the server has several CPUs?
No more than any other single-process Python application (no less, either).
Unless you run multiple processes...
As far as I know
Jp Calderone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Has anyone experience high load and twisted?
Distributing load across multiple machines scales better than distributing
it over multiple CPUs in a single machine. If you have serious scalability
requirements, SMP is a minor step in the wrong
Jp Calderone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Distributing load across multiple machines scales better than
distributing it over multiple CPUs in a single machine. If you have
serious scalability requirements, SMP is a minor step in the wrong
direction (unless you're talking about something like
On 19 May 2005 17:01:11 -0700, Paul Rubin http://phr.cx@nospam.invalid
wrote:
Jp Calderone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Distributing load across multiple machines scales better than
distributing it over multiple CPUs in a single machine. If you have
serious scalability requirements, SMP is a
