Fredrik Tolf writes:
> ...
>> Maybe all you need to add is implementation for obj.__reduce__
>
> That would certainly work, and I guess I could perhaps use it as a
> work-around, but that would mean I'd have to mark every single such
> class as such in some way or another. What I'm looking for is
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013, Prasad, Ramit wrote:
Fredrik Tolf wrote:
[...]
I considered trying to create subclasses of the pickler and unpickler that
pickle a reference to a module loader and data for the particular module
along with a class that comes from such a module, by overriding
Pickler.save_glo
Fredrik Tolf wrote:
>
> Dear list,
>
> I have a system in which I load modules dynamically every now and then
> (that is, creating a module with types.ModuleType, compiling the code for
> the module and then executing it in the module with exec()), and where I
> would wish to be able to have clas
Dear list,
I have a system in which I load modules dynamically every now and then
(that is, creating a module with types.ModuleType, compiling the code for
the module and then executing it in the module with exec()), and where I
would wish to be able to have classes in those modules containing
