Re: WSGI with mod_python (was: Python, WSGI, legacy web application)

2006-11-23 Thread Graham Dumpleton
Paul Boddie wrote: > Rob De Almeida wrote: > > Ben Finney wrote: > > > I was under the impression that WSGI in mod_python was a rather kludgy > > > way to do WSGI, but I don't know what the alternatives are. CGI? > > > Python http server (e.g. CherryPy)? Something else? > > > > You can use FastCGI

Re: WSGI with mod_python (was: Python, WSGI, legacy web application)

2006-11-23 Thread Paul Boddie
Rob De Almeida wrote: > Ben Finney wrote: > > I was under the impression that WSGI in mod_python was a rather kludgy > > way to do WSGI, but I don't know what the alternatives are. CGI? > > Python http server (e.g. CherryPy)? Something else? > > You can use FastCGI or SCGI too, with Apache, lighttp

Re: WSGI with mod_python (was: Python, WSGI, legacy web application)

2006-11-23 Thread Rob De Almeida
Ben Finney wrote: > I was under the impression that WSGI in mod_python was a rather kludgy > way to do WSGI, but I don't know what the alternatives are. CGI? > Python http server (e.g. CherryPy)? Something else? You can use FastCGI or SCGI too, with Apache, lighttpd or Cherokee. I have a short des

WSGI with mod_python (was: Python, WSGI, legacy web application)

2006-11-22 Thread Ben Finney
"Graham Dumpleton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Look at mod_python for Apache. If you use it correctly you can on a > page by page basis as need be, replace the existing PHP pages with > equivalents written using Python. You could do this by programming > right at the level of mod_python, or agai