Nick Coghlan wrote:
If the caller is meant to supply a namespace, get them to supply a
namespace.
def f(ns1, ns2):
print ns1['a'], ns1['b'], ns2['a'], ns2['b']
f(ns1 = dict(a=1, b=2), ns2 = dict(a=3, b=4))
Hey, where's Steve? Maybe his generic objects should be called
namespaces instead of bun
If the caller is meant to supply a namespace, get them to supply a namespace.
def f(ns1, ns2):
print ns1['a'], ns1['b'], ns2['a'], ns2['b']
f(ns1 = dict(a=1, b=2), ns2 = dict(a=3, b=4))
Hey, where's Steve? Maybe his generic objects should be called namespaces
instead of bunches. . .
def f(ns1,
Jeff Shannon wrote:
Jonathan Fine wrote:
The use of *args and **kwargs allows functions to take a variable number
of arguments. The addition of ***nsargs does not add significantly.
I've posted usage examples elsewhere in this thread.
I think they show that ***nsargs do provide a benefit.
At l
Jonathan Fine wrote:
I'll post some usage examples later today, I hope.
Well, here are some examples. A day later, I'm afraid.
** Pipelines and other composites
This is arising for me at work.
I produce Postscript by running TeX on a document.
And then running dvips on the output of TeX.
TeX as
Jonathan Fine wrote:
Jeff Shannon wrote:
Jonathan Fine wrote:
Giudo has suggested adding optional static typing to Python.
(I hope suggested is the correct word.)
http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=85551
An example of the syntax he proposes is:
> def f(this:that=other):
> pri
Jeff Shannon wrote:
Jonathan Fine wrote:
Giudo has suggested adding optional static typing to Python.
(I hope suggested is the correct word.)
http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=85551
An example of the syntax he proposes is:
> def f(this:that=other):
> print this
I'm going to
Jonathan Fine wrote:
Giudo has suggested adding optional static typing to Python.
(I hope suggested is the correct word.)
http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=85551
An example of the syntax he proposes is:
> def f(this:that=other):
> print this
This means that f() has a 'this'
Giudo has suggested adding optional static typing to Python.
(I hope suggested is the correct word.)
http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=85551
An example of the syntax he proposes is:
> def f(this:that=other):
> print this
This means that f() has a 'this' parameter, of type 'tha
