On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 4:20 AM Random832 wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020, at 02:10, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> > issubclass(bool, int) gives True
> > but
> > super(bool) gives
> >
> > Do I not understand the meaning of super, or is this inconsistent?
>
> I've never heard of a one-argument form for
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020, at 02:10, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> issubclass(bool, int) gives True
> but
> super(bool) gives
>
> Do I not understand the meaning of super, or is this inconsistent?
I've never heard of a one-argument form for super, but I just tried something
and now I'm confused about the
Cecil Westerhof writes:
>> I've never actually looked at the repr of a super object - I've always
>> just called a method on it immediately after constructing it. Never
>> seen a need to hang onto one :)
>
> Well, maybe I will never need it, but I am just curious. And sometimes
> it was very hand
Chris Angelico writes:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 4:16 PM Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>>
>> issubclass(bool, int) gives True
>> but
>> super(bool) gives
>>
>> Do I not understand the meaning of super, or is this inconsistent?
>>
>> (Until now I have not down much work with classes in Python.)
>>
>
>
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 4:16 PM Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>
> issubclass(bool, int) gives True
> but
> super(bool) gives
>
> Do I not understand the meaning of super, or is this inconsistent?
>
> (Until now I have not down much work with classes in Python.)
>
One-arg super is an unbound object, and
issubclass(bool, int) gives True
but
super(bool) gives
Do I not understand the meaning of super, or is this inconsistent?
(Until now I have not down much work with classes in Python.)
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
--
https://ma
