Rocco Moretti [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John Roth wrote:
Peter Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
George Sakkis schrieb:
Given that the latest 2.x python will be 2.9
Why not 2.13 or 2.4711? Version strings are sequences of arbitrary
integers
George Sakkis schrieb:
Given that the latest 2.x python will be 2.9
Why not 2.13 or 2.4711? Version strings are sequences of arbitrary
integers separated by dots and not decimal numbers, or are they?
--
---
Peter Maas, M+R
Peter Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
George Sakkis schrieb:
Given that the latest 2.x python will be 2.9
Why not 2.13 or 2.4711? Version strings are sequences of arbitrary
integers separated by dots and not decimal numbers, or are they?
Because Guido said
John Roth wrote:
Peter Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
George Sakkis schrieb:
Given that the latest 2.x python will be 2.9
Why not 2.13 or 2.4711? Version strings are sequences of arbitrary
integers separated by dots and not decimal numbers, or are they?
Thanks! Even the fact that these ideas
have been organized into a PEP is
exciting to methere is hope that
they may *someday* be implemented. Maybe sooner than people think.
Another reason to love Python like no other.
Chris
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guido gave a nice Python Regrets Power Point talk at OSCON few years
ago.
I was wondering if the plan is to ever implement these ideas.
e.g. Guido said he'd prefer 'print' to be a *function* with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks! Even the fact that these ideas
have been organized into a PEP is
exciting to methere is hope that
they may *someday* be implemented. Maybe sooner than people think.
Given that the latest 2.x python will be 2.9 and that 3.0 may be
released in parallel
Guido gave a nice Python Regrets Power Point talk at OSCON few years
ago.
I was wondering if the plan is to ever implement these ideas.
e.g. Guido said he'd prefer 'print' to be a *function* with perhaps a
'println' version IIRC.
He also had a ton of stuff he'd rather see become
Python 3000 is the proveribal and so far hypothetical version of the
language in which backward incompatible changes will be allowed (and
encouraged).
See
http://www.python.org/peps/pep-3000.html
for details.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guido gave a nice Python Regrets Power Point talk at OSCON
