norseman wrote:
"...This patch changes "ntpath" ..."changing or adding to such a
module which is OS specific is fine with me.
[...]
To point it bluntly: How does one use "F:" in Linux in the identical
fashion as a MicroSoft OS?
Sorry, I assumed this was common knowledge: os.path is impl
Aahz wrote:
In article ,
Larry Hastings wrote:
I've written a patch for Python 3.1 that changes os.path so it handles
UNC paths on Windows. You can read about it at the Python bug tracker:
http://bugs.python.org/issue5799
I'd like to gauge community interest in the patch. After all, it
Larry Hastings wrote:
I've written a patch for Python 3.1 that changes os.path so it handles
UNC paths on Windows. You can read about it at the Python bug tracker:
http://bugs.python.org/issue5799
I'd like to gauge community interest in the patch. After all, it's has
been declined bef
In article ,
Larry Hastings wrote:
>
>I've written a patch for Python 3.1 that changes os.path so it handles
>UNC paths on Windows. You can read about it at the Python bug tracker:
>
>http://bugs.python.org/issue5799
>
>I'd like to gauge community interest in the patch. After all, it's has
Larry Hastings wrote:
I've written a patch for Python 3.1 that changes os.path so it handles
UNC paths on Windows. You can read about it at the Python bug tracker:
http://bugs.python.org/issue5799
I'd like to gauge community interest in the patch. After all, it's has
been declined bef
I've written a patch for Python 3.1 that changes os.path so it handles
UNC paths on Windows. You can read about it at the Python bug tracker:
http://bugs.python.org/issue5799
I'd like to gauge community interest in the patch. After all, it's has
been declined before; I submitted a simi