http://www.stephenwolfram.com/publications/recent/mathml/index.html
i was trying to find the publication date and context, but didn't find
it last time after a couple min. Yesterday, on rereading, i did. The
article in question is:
«
Mathematical Notation: Past and Future (2000)
Stephen Wolfram
list of regular reciprocal
pairs”.
Xah
∑ http://xahlee.org/
☄
On Aug 15, 10:54 pm, Xah Lee wrote:
> Xah's Edu Corner: The importance of syntax & notations.
>http://www.stephenwolfram.com/publications/recent/mathml/mathml_abstr...
> this article should teach the coding sophomorons
Xah Lee wrote:
Xah's Edu Corner: The importance of syntax & notations.
http://www.stephenwolfram.com/publications/recent/mathml/mathml_abstract.html
this article should teach the coding sophomorons and computer
“science” idiotic authors who harbor the notion that syntax is not
["Followup-To:" header set to comp.lang.lisp.]
On 2009-08-17, Peter Keller wrote:
> In comp.lang.scheme Peter Keller wrote:
>> The distance() function in this new model is the centroid of the syntactic
>> datum which represent the semantic object.
>
> Oops.
>
> I meant to say:
>
> "The distance()
In comp.lang.scheme Peter Keller wrote:
> The distance() function in this new model is the centroid of the syntactic
> datum which represent the semantic object.
Oops.
I meant to say:
"The distance() function in this new model uses the centroid of each
individual syntactic datum (which represen
gh. I was expecting he'd go
into some details about the science of math notations, or, as he put
it aptly: “linguistics of math notations”. However, he didn't touch
the subject, except saying that it haven't been studied.
Xah
On Aug 15, 10:54 pm, Xah Lee wrote:
> Xah's E
In comp.lang.scheme toby wrote:
> In my opinion Knuth believed in the value of literate programming for
> similar reasons: To try to exploit existing cognitive training. If
> your user base is familiar with English, or mathematical notation, or
> some other lexicography, try to exploit the pre-wir
w_a_x_man wrote:
> On Aug 16, 11:05 am, Petey Keller wrote:
>> Compiler go through *great* pains
>
> Compiler work real hard.
> Compiler have heap big trouble.
ROTFL. :-)
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?u
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listin
On Aug 16, 9:05 am, Peter Keller wrote:
> In comp.lang.scheme Xah Lee wrote:
>
> > Xah's Edu Corner: The importance of syntax & notations.
>
> >http://www.stephenwolfram.com/publications/recent/mathml/mathml_abstr...
>
> > this article should te
On Aug 16, 12:05 pm, Peter Keller wrote:
> In comp.lang.scheme Xah Lee wrote:
>
> > Xah's Edu Corner: The importance of syntax & notations.
>
> >http://www.stephenwolfram.com/publications/recent/mathml/mathml_abstr...
>
> > this article should te
In comp.lang.scheme w_a_x_man wrote:
> On Aug 16, 11:05?am, Petey Keller wrote:
>> Compiler go through *great* pains
>
> Compiler work real hard.
> Compiler have heap big trouble.
That's a funny observation in the context of this thread--which I
appreciate, since syntax really is the cornersto
On Aug 16, 11:05 am, Petey Keller wrote:
> Compiler go through *great* pains
Compiler work real hard.
Compiler have heap big trouble.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
In comp.lang.scheme Xah Lee wrote:
> Xah's Edu Corner: The importance of syntax & notations.
>
> http://www.stephenwolfram.com/publications/recent/mathml/mathml_abstract.html
>
> this article should teach the coding sophomorons and computer
> ?science? idiotic authors
Xah's Edu Corner: The importance of syntax & notations.
http://www.stephenwolfram.com/publications/recent/mathml/mathml_abstract.html
this article should teach the coding sophomorons and computer
“science” idiotic authors who harbor the notion that syntax is not
important, picked up b
14 matches
Mail list logo
