Hendrik van Rooyen schrieb:
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
sounds like he wants/needs non-cooperative, mandatory locking.
Could one get there using ctypes to disable interrupts?
Not as such, ctypes can't execute arbitrary machine code. But of course
you can create a C-lib that does what you want (I
"Hendrik van Rooyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Fredrik Lundh wrote:
>
>>sounds like he wants/needs non-cooperative, mandatory locking.
More accurately, he THINKS he wants/needs mandatory locking. We need to
find out what he's really trying to accomplish before we can suggest
something that i
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
>sounds like he wants/needs non-cooperative, mandatory locking.
Could one get there using ctypes to disable interrupts?
Cross Platform?
I can think of lots of hassles, starting with permissions
to use the privileged instructions.
- Hendrik
--
http://mail.python.org/mai
Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
AFAIC that kind of mutual exclusion is what atomicity is about. What
else do you expect to happen?
sounds like he wants/needs non-cooperative, mandatory locking.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Michele Simionato wrote:
The page you link here is WAYS better than the standard documentation
of the threading module.
Generally speaking, the effbot zone contains a lot of improvements
over the standard docs which are lacking in various areas.
I have always wondered why they are kept separated
On Sep 5, 10:59 am, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 1) seehttp://effbot.org/zone/thread-synchronization.htm
The page you link here is WAYS better than the standard documentation
of the threading module.
Generally speaking, the effbot zone contains a lot of improvements
over the standa
Ahmad Humayun schrieb:
On Sep 5, 1:59 pm, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ahmad Humayun wrote:
I need to create an atomic section in Python code i.e. there is no
context switch to any other thread during the running of that piece of
code. Would would do the trick?
use a lock, and make
On Sep 5, 1:59 pm, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ahmad Humayun wrote:
> > I need to create an atomic section in Python code i.e. there is no
> > context switch to any other thread during the running of that piece of
> > code. Would would do the trick?
>
> use a lock, and make sure that
Ahmad Humayun wrote:
I need to create an atomic section in Python code i.e. there is no
context switch to any other thread during the running of that piece of
code. Would would do the trick?
use a lock, and make sure that anyone that needs access to the shared
state you're manipulating in tha
Hi there,
I need to create an atomic section in Python code i.e. there is no
context switch to any other thread during the running of that piece of
code. Would would do the trick?
thanks,
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
10 matches
Mail list logo
