Steven Bethard wrote:
Michael Spencer wrote:
> While we're on the topic, what do you think of having unary,
> non-summary builtins automatically map themselves when called with an
> iterable that would otherwise be an illegal argument:
I personally don't much like the idea because I expect 'int'
Michael Spencer wrote:
> While we're on the topic, what do you think of having unary,
> non-summary builtins automatically map themselves when called with an
> iterable that would otherwise be an illegal argument:
>
> e.g.,
> int(iterable) -> (int(i) for i in iterable)
> ord(iterable) -> (ord(i) fo
