On Nov 18, 7:13 pm, Terry Reedy wrote:
> It amounts to duplicating raise x...exception x as break xcontinue x
> in the name of aesthetics and supposed efficiency. There would be no new
> functionality nor any abbreviation of code. The semantics of
there would be abbreviation: you wouldn't hav
Chris Rebert wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 4:05 AM, Lo'oris wrote:
I've found this email, back from 10 years ago:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/1999-September/009983.html
I guess it went unnoticed, because that proposal looks really
intresting.
I think it went unnoticed becau
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 4:05 AM, Lo'oris wrote:
> I've found this email, back from 10 years ago:
> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/1999-September/009983.html
>
> I guess it went unnoticed, because that proposal looks really
> intresting.
>
> • break labels have been refused into pytho
I've found this email, back from 10 years ago:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/1999-September/009983.html
I guess it went unnoticed, because that proposal looks really
intresting.
• break labels have been refused into python
• we can do it anyway using exceptions
• this is a proposal
