[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I don't know if you noticed but i changed my mind and removed the post
No, I didn't. It seems to be kept in the cache of my newsreader.
> as i realised that people seemed to have much more interest in how
> relevant c code still is than in solving an interesting proble
Hi Peter,
I don't know if you noticed but i changed my mind and removed the post
as i realised that people seemed to have much more interest in how
relevant c code still is than in solving an interesting problem.
I only speak French and Dutch and my knowledge of Belgium's third
official language
Hi Peter,
I don't know if you noticed but i changed my mind and removed the post
as i realised that people seemed to have much more interest in how
relevant c code still is than in solving an interesting problem.
I only speak French and Dutch and my knowledge of Belgium's third
official language
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have what in my eyes seems a challenging problem.
> Thanks to Peter Otten, i got the following code to work. It is a sort
> of named tuple.
Don't trust code posted in a newsgroup -- it may sometimes be
quality-challenged :-)
> Now my problem is the following. I want
Now, a tab-free version of my previous post. (Sorry for the
inconvenience)
Hi,
I have what in my eyes seems a challenging problem.
Thanks to Peter Otten, i got the following code to work. It is a sort
of named tuple.
from operator import itemgetter
def constgetter(value):
def get(self): r
Hi,
I have what in my eyes seems a challenging problem.
Thanks to Peter Otten, i got the following code to work. It is a sort
of named tuple.
from operator import itemgetter
def constgetter(value):
def get(self): return value
return get
def createTuple(*names):
class TupleT
