Re: choice of web-framework

In article , ros...@gmail.com says... > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 6:57 AM, Chris Warrick wrote: > > On 23 October 2017 at 21:37, John Black wrote: > >> Chris, thanks for all this detailed information. I

Re: choice of web-framework

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 4:14 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: > > (There are other ORMs than SQLAlchemy, of course; I can't recall the > exact syntax for Django's off the top of my head, but it's going to be > broadly similar to this.) > > ChrisA > -- >

Re: choice of web-framework

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 6:57 AM, Chris Warrick wrote: > On 23 October 2017 at 21:37, John Black wrote: >> Chris, thanks for all this detailed information. I am confused though >> with your database recommendation. You say you teach SQLAlchemy but >>

Re: choice of web-framework

On 23 October 2017 at 21:37, John Black wrote: > Chris, thanks for all this detailed information. I am confused though > with your database recommendation. You say you teach SQLAlchemy but > generally use PostgreSQL yourself. I can maybe guess why there seems to > be this

Re: choice of web-framework

In article , ros...@gmail.com says... > For the database, I generally use PostgreSQL, unless the job's so > simple it can be done with flat files. Using Flask with SQLAlchemy is > a popular option, but you can also dive into psycopg2 directly (the

Re: choice of web-framework

Greetings, while reading through this topic i would like to know, if cherrypy is a viable web-framework as well? I stumbled upon this project a while ago, but didn't read through it in detail and would like to hear something about it, especially in regards to the project requirements. Kind

Re: choice of web-framework

Patrick Vrijlandt writes: > ... > The project is completely new, there are no histories to take into > account (current solutions are paper-based). The website involves > questionnaires that will be developed, filled out and stored. Users > are not programmers or developers.

Re: choice of web-framework

have you considered Django? i've found found it to be nice ! Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer, Mauritius abdurrahmaanjanhangeer.wordpress.com On 22 Oct 2017 14:25, "Patrick Vrijlandt" <nieuws...@xs4all.nl> wrote: > Hello list, > > I would like your recommendation on the

Re: choice of web-framework

On 2017-10-22 15:26, Patrick Vrijlandt wrote: > The version control I was referring to, is indeed users' data. I > plan to use Mercurial for the source code. The questionnaires being > developed will go through many revisions. The questionnaires being > filled in, are enough work to have a

Re: choice of web-framework

On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 3:24 AM, Patrick Vrijlandt <nieuws...@xs4all.nl> wrote: > Hello list, > > I would like your recommendation on the choice of a web framework. > > The project is completely new, there are no histories to take into account > (current solutions are p

Re: choice of web-framework

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 12:26 AM, Patrick Vrijlandt wrote: > Op 22-10-2017 om 14:05 schreef Tim Chase: > >> I'm not sure what "version control is required" means in this >> context. Is this version-control of the users' answers? Or >> version-control of the source code. If

Re: choice of web-framework

Op 22-10-2017 om 14:05 schreef Tim Chase: > I'm not sure what "version control is required" means in this > context. Is this version-control of the users' answers? Or > version-control of the source code. If it's the source code, the web > framework won't help you there, but git, mercurial, or

Re: choice of web-framework

On 2017-10-22 12:24, Patrick Vrijlandt wrote: > I would like your recommendation on the choice of a web framework. Might depend on what skills you already bring to the table. If you already know an ORM like SQLAlchemy or a template language like Jinja, you might want to take the &qu

Re: choice of web-framework

On 22 October 2017 at 13:48, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 10:34 PM, Chris Warrick wrote: >> On 22 October 2017 at 13:25, Lele Gaifax wrote: >>> Chris Warrick writes: >>> Zope is effectively

Re: choice of web-framework

On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 10:34 PM, Chris Warrick wrote: > On 22 October 2017 at 13:25, Lele Gaifax wrote: >> Chris Warrick writes: >> >>> Zope is effectively dead these days. >> >> Except it's alive and kicking:

Re: choice of web-framework

On 22 October 2017 at 13:25, Lele Gaifax wrote: > Chris Warrick writes: > >> Zope is effectively dead these days. > > Except it's alive and kicking: https://blog.gocept.com/ > > :-) > > ciao, lele. A few people still care, sure. But how alive is a

Re: choice of web-framework

Chris Warrick writes: > Zope is effectively dead these days. Except it's alive and kicking: https://blog.gocept.com/ :-) ciao, lele. -- nickname: Lele Gaifax | Quando vivrò di quello che ho pensato ieri real: Emanuele Gaifas | comincerò ad aver paura di chi mi copia.

Re: choice of web-framework

On 22 October 2017 at 12:24, Patrick Vrijlandt <nieuws...@xs4all.nl> wrote: > Hello list, > > I would like your recommendation on the choice of a web framework. > > The project is completely new, there are no histories to take into account > (current solutions are p

Re: choice of web-framework

On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 9:24 PM, Patrick Vrijlandt <nieuws...@xs4all.nl> wrote: > Hello list, > > I would like your recommendation on the choice of a web framework. > > The project is completely new, there are no histories to take into account > (current solutions are p

choice of web-framework

Hello list, I would like your recommendation on the choice of a web framework. The project is completely new, there are no histories to take into account (current solutions are paper-based). The website involves questionnaires that will be developed, filled out and stored. Users