In article 20efdb6a-c1a5-47dc-8546-7c4ae548e...@g1g2000pra.googlegroups.com,
Carl Banks pavlovevide...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 22, 8:38=A0pm, a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote:
In article f3d88edf-b5d3-43e4-89a3-b05ef0f55...@p28g2000vbn.googlegroups=
.com,
Carl Banks =A0pavlovevide...@gmail.com
In article f3d88edf-b5d3-43e4-89a3-b05ef0f55...@p28g2000vbn.googlegroups.com,
Carl Banks pavlovevide...@gmail.com wrote:
You have to be REALLY REALLY careful not to pass any user-supplied
data to it if this is a server running on your computer, of course.
Unless, of course, your users are
On Jul 22, 8:38 pm, a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote:
In article
f3d88edf-b5d3-43e4-89a3-b05ef0f55...@p28g2000vbn.googlegroups.com,
Carl Banks pavlovevide...@gmail.com wrote:
You have to be REALLY REALLY careful not to pass any user-supplied
data to it if this is a server running on your
On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 21:53:59 -0400, Esmail wrote:
In general I would agree with you, but in my specific case I want so
store some additional meta-data with each function, such as the valid
range for input values, where the max or minimum are located, the
name/source for the function etc. I am
En Mon, 20 Jul 2009 22:53:59 -0300, Esmail ebo...@hotmail.com escribió:
Gabriel Genellina wrote:
If you follow the above suggestions, you'll see that your Function
class becomes almost useless: a normal function already IS an object,
so you don't have to wrap it inside ANOTHER object
Hello all,
I am trying to store a function and some associated information in an
object so that I can later have series of functions in a list that I can
evaluate one at a time.
Right now I am only storing the function itself, the number of
arguments it expects and its string representation. I
On Jul 20, 6:22 pm, Esmail ebo...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
I am trying to store a function and some associated information in an
object so that I can later have series of functions in a list that I can
evaluate one at a time.
Right now I am only storing the function itself, the number
En Mon, 20 Jul 2009 14:44:16 -0300, Francesco Bochicchio
bieff...@gmail.com escribió:
On Jul 20, 6:22 pm, Esmail ebo...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
I am trying to store a function and some associated information in an
object so that I can later have series of functions in a list that I
Gabriel Genellina wrote:
If you follow the above suggestions, you'll see that your Function class
becomes almost useless: a normal function already IS an object, so you
don't have to wrap it inside ANOTHER object unless you need very special
features.
Hello Gabriel,
In general I would
Hi Francesco,
Those were great suggestions!
Re 1: I used the __doc__ attribute to eliminate the parameter in the
constructor as you suggested. Also, much easier to specify the
character string with the actual function than later to match it
up like I was.
class
On Jul 20, 9:22 am, Esmail ebo...@hotmail.com wrote:
def funct1(x):
''' small test function '''
return x * x
def funct2(x, y):
''' small test function '''
return x + y
def funct3(x):
''' small test function '''
return 1000 + (x*x + x) * math.cos(x)
def
11 matches
Mail list logo
