I have no problem with threads
Using gmail in a browser.
That said I like how google groups handles email.
I am also ways having to fix the reply on this list to send back to the list
and not to the list and the last author. If someone knows a way to fix that
I would be happy to hear it.
Vincent
This isn't about Python but I'm seeking suggestions as to the best way
to access the newsgroup.
It seems that messages are coming from a number of sources, such as
gmane and google groups.
The problem is that many messages seem to get unlinked from their threads.
I use Thunderbird 3.0.5 and
On 5/15/2010 6:34 PM, cjw wrote:
This isn't about Python but I'm seeking suggestions as to the best way
to access the newsgroup.
It seems that messages are coming from a number of sources, such as
gmane and google groups.
The problem is that many messages seem to get unlinked from their
In article mailman.245.1273986020.32709.python-l...@python.org,
Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 5/15/2010 6:34 PM, cjw wrote:
The problem is that many messages seem to get unlinked from their threads.
Some people have said that that is due to newreaders not tagging
responses properly.
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Aahz a...@pythoncraft.com wrote:
It's also at least partly due to problems with mail-news gateways and
the differing fields used to maintain threading.
Some blame goes on MUAs too :)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
In article 03081704-17b5-4c7d-82db-8efb7ebce...@q11g2000yqh.googlegroups.com,
Esmail ebo...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been reading/posting to usenet since the 80s with a variety of
tools (vn, and most recently Thunderbird) but since my ISP
(TimeWarner) no longer provides usenet feeds I'm stuck.
You
aahz In article
03081704-17b5-4c7d-82db-8efb7ebce...@q11g2000yqh.googlegroups.com,
aahz Esmail ebo...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been reading/posting to usenet since the 80s with a variety of
tools (vn, and most recently Thunderbird) but since my ISP
(TimeWarner) no
On Mar 21, 2:17 am, Esmail ebo...@hottymail.com wrote:
Terry Reedy wrote:
Ditto, with T-bird. Just add a newsgroup account with news.gmane.org or
snews.gmane.org (for ssl) as the server and set the rest as you please.
gmane.comp.python.general is a mirror of python-list, from python.org,
this in a nice threaded way,
possibly with some sort of preview? I'm also worried about
missing posts in specific threads (such as the ones I start :-)
If you are reading/posting to comp.lang.python with something
other than the regular web interface provided by google and
you are happy with it, would you
I'd almost like to think there are a bunch
of nice python programs out there that to
this :-)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
groups, is
there another way to read/post this in a nice threaded way,
possibly with some sort of preview? I'm also worried about
missing posts in specific threads (such as the ones I start :-)
If you are reading/posting to comp.lang.python with something
other than the regular web
to comp.lang.python with something
other than the regular web interface provided by google and
you are happy with it, would you share it?
I use the news.gmane.org usenet feeds.
-Mark
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Thank you Mark and Albert, exactly the sort of information
I was looking for.
Cheers,
Esmail
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
are reading/posting to comp.lang.python with something
other than the regular web interface provided by google and
you are happy with it, would you share it?
I use the news.gmane.org usenet feeds.
Ditto, with T-bird. Just add a newsgroup account with news.gmane.org or
snews.gmane.org (for ssl
Terry Reedy wrote:
Ditto, with T-bird. Just add a newsgroup account with news.gmane.org or
snews.gmane.org (for ssl) as the server and set the rest as you please.
gmane.comp.python.general is a mirror of python-list, from python.org,
with its spam filtering that exclude most of the crap
Grant Edwards a écrit :
On 2009-01-27, Bruno Desthuilliers bruno.42.desthuilli...@websiteburo.invalid
wrote:
Please visit comp.databases or comp.lang.javascript for really
unfriendly and unhelpful places where few happens except
bickering and name-calling.
I've always found comp.lang.c to
rantingrick a écrit :
On Jan 27, 10:12 am, Bruno Desthuilliers bruno.
42.desthuilli...@websiteburo.invalid wrote:
All you can say is that he didn't *post* here (at least under his real
identity...) for the 9 past years - this doesn't mean he never *reads*
(and this, you just have no way to
On 2009-01-28, Bruno Desthuilliers bruno.42.desthuilli...@websiteburo.invalid
wrote:
very interesting. We should have a vote as to who would be the
most likely candidate, now that would be a good thread :)
Waste of time as far as I'm concerned.
Usenet? Wasting time? Never!
--
Grant
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:07 AM, rantingrick rantingr...@gmail.com wrote:
I curious of how many are really out there. I have been watching the
list for some time but basically see the same 10 or so people
answering questions.
Reply to this message so we can see how many exists here
Thanks
I curious of how many are really out there. I have been watching the
list for some time but basically see the same 10 or so people
answering questions.
Reply to this message so we can see how many exists here
Thanks
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
how you arrived at that low number. If you go to the main
page on the Google Groups version, you'll count at least 20 on page
1:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/topics
Mike
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
comp.lang.python is a dead Parrot
(but there could be other reasons?)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Seems like the only thing people are interested in is bickering and
name calling. I noticed the post Does Python really follow... has
over 400 post mainly from the same 10 people. Maybe this is why Guido
no longer wishes to be a part of this group. Where is the sense of
community here?
Anybody
at comp.lang.ruby.
This makes me wonder if Guido thinks comp.lang.python is a dead Parrot
(but there could be other reasons?)
I've seen him on the distutils list, but I think he generally keeps to
the dev lists mostly. This list is for general users (i.e. mostly
newbs). We do get some good discussions
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:42 AM, rantingrick rantingr...@gmail.com wrote:
Seems like the only thing people are interested in is bickering and
name calling. I noticed the post Does Python really follow... has
over 400 post mainly from the same 10 people. Maybe this is why Guido
no longer
On Jan 27, 9:43 am, Mike Driscoll kyoso...@gmail.com wrote:
I think Guido has better things to do...and his employer probably
doesn't want him spending all day answering stuff like that.
Mike
I totally agree, and i would never expect him to field noob questions
but i just thought it odd he
rantingrick a écrit :
On Jan 27, 9:43 am, Mike Driscoll kyoso...@gmail.com wrote:
I think Guido has better things to do...and his employer probably
doesn't want him spending all day answering stuff like that.
Mike
I totally agree, and i would never expect him to field noob questions
but i
rantingrick a écrit :
Seems like the only thing people are interested in is bickering and
name calling. I noticed the post Does Python really follow... has
over 400 post mainly from the same 10 people.
There are occasionally such kind of threads, indeed. And, as Mike
mentionned, the usual
comp.lang.python, OR
that there is traffic in comp.lang.python other than
bickering and name-calling?
My own rough estimate of readership is at least 4,000.
If motivated, one could refine the figure, I'm
confident).
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2009-01-27, Bruno Desthuilliers bruno.42.desthuilli...@websiteburo.invalid
wrote:
Please visit comp.databases or comp.lang.javascript for really
unfriendly and unhelpful places where few happens except
bickering and name-calling.
I've always found comp.lang.c to be a rather dangerous
Being a newbie and not aware of other good places to ask dump questions. I
have been very happy with the help I have gotten. Some of the
other discussions are a little interesting to me but I wonder/am grateful if
these keep the knowledgeable people around so us newbies can ask questions.
Since I
On Jan 27, 10:12 am, Bruno Desthuilliers bruno.
42.desthuilli...@websiteburo.invalid wrote:
All you can say is that he didn't *post* here (at least under his real
identity...) for the 9 past years - this doesn't mean he never *reads*
(and this, you just have no way to know).
Ah, this is a
Bruno Desthuilliers bruno.42.desthuilli...@websiteburo.invalid writes:
All you can say is that he didn't *post* here (at least under his real
identity...) for the 9 past years - this doesn't mean he never *reads*
(and this, you just have no way to know).
Guido does post here once in a while,
On Jan 27, 12:00 pm, Paul Rubin http://phr...@nospam.invalid wrote:
Guido does post here once in a while, under his own name. I can't
think of any very recent examples, but I can remember some from a few
years back.
I searched the archives for Guido van Rossum and there is nothing
since May
* rantingrick (Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:03:16 -0800 (PST))
On Jan 27, 12:00 pm, Paul Rubin http://phr...@nospam.invalid wrote:
Guido does post here once in a while, under his own name. I can't
think of any very recent examples, but I can remember some from a few
years back.
I searched the
Grant Edwards inva...@invalid writes:
I've always found comp.lang.c to be a rather dangerous place as well.
Hey, I grew up in comp.lang.c!
I'd have to agree with you, though. (I try to play nice when I'm here.)
In fact, comp.lang.* generally has a reputation as a place you don't
want to
Of the newsgroups I read, c.l.python is probably the most friendly and
has one of the highest S/N ratios. People who would have been roasted
alive in other newsgroups for their laziness or presumptuousness get
surprisingly gentle treatment in c.l.python. I do know of a few
low-volume
rantingrick wrote:
On Jan 27, 12:00 pm, Paul Rubin http://phr...@nospam.invalid wrote:
Guido does post here once in a while, under his own name. I can't
think of any very recent examples, but I can remember some from a few
years back.
I searched the archives for Guido van Rossum and there
=as_sitesearch=as_qdr=as_mind=1as_minm=1as_miny=2009
as_maxd=1as_maxm=1as_maxy=2009
as_ugroup=comp.lang.pythonas_usubject=as_uauthors=guido+van+rossumsa
fe=off
Or even:
http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?show=moreenc_user=RVb59hDAKHw2rKTOXQmYRzwTg33Egroup=comp.lang.python
which shows 456
On Jan 27, 2:52 pm, Duncan Booth duncan.bo...@invalid.invalid wrote:
Thorsten Kampe thors...@thorstenkampe.de wrote:
* rantingrick (Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:03:16 -0800 (PST))
On Jan 27, 12:00 pm, Paul Rubin http://phr...@nospam.invalid wrote:
Guido does post here once in a while, under his own
On Jan 27, 11:53 am, rantingrick rantingr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 27, 10:12 am, Bruno Desthuilliers bruno.
42.desthuilli...@websiteburo.invalid wrote:
All you can say is that he didn't *post* here (at least under his real
identity...) for the 9 past years - this doesn't mean he never
Martin P. Hellwig martin.hell...@dcuktec.org wrote:
Or you can argue that even when an argument is repeated indefinitely it
doesn't make it suddenly right.
This is no good.
It's a well known fact that anything I tell you three times is true.
To demonstrate:
Tim Rowe's post earlier in this
On 23 Jan., 08:13, Philip Semanchuk phi...@semanchuk.com wrote:
On Jan 23, 2009, at 12:39 AM, Kay Schluehr wrote:
Whatever sufficiently sophisticated topic was initially discussed
it ends all up in a request for removing reference counting and the
GIL.
Is this a variant of Godwin's Law
2009/1/23 Kay Schluehr kay.schlu...@gmx.net:
Whatever sufficiently sophisticated topic was the initially discussed
it ends all up in a request for removing reference counting and the
GIL.
Well, maybe, but it seems to me that the real issue here is that we
need to remove reference counting and
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Tim Rowe digi...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/1/23 Kay Schluehr kay.schlu...@gmx.net:
Whatever sufficiently sophisticated topic was the initially discussed
it ends all up in a request for removing reference counting and the
GIL.
Well, maybe, but it seems to me
I dub it Schluehr's law.
On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 21:39 -0800, Kay Schluehr wrote:
Whatever sufficiently sophisticated topic was the initially discussed
it ends all up in a request for removing reference counting and the
GIL.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
--
2009/1/23 Benjamin Kaplan benjamin.kap...@case.edu:
BTW, he said sufficiently sophisticated topic. Since there hasn't been an
extremely long post here yet, I don't know if this counts.
Had I waited until the thread became long enough, somebody else would
have already raised the issue -- you
Tim Rowe wrote:
2009/1/23 Kay Schluehr kay.schlu...@gmx.net:
Whatever sufficiently sophisticated topic was the initially discussed
it ends all up in a request for removing reference counting and the
GIL.
Well, maybe, but it seems to me that the real issue here is that we
need to remove
Tim Rowe wrote:
2009/1/23 Kay Schluehr kay.schlu...@gmx.net:
Whatever sufficiently sophisticated topic was the initially discussed
it ends all up in a request for removing reference counting and the
GIL.
Well, maybe, but it seems to me that the real issue here is that we
need to remove
2009/1/23 Martin P. Hellwig martin.hell...@dcuktec.org:
Or you can argue that even when an argument is repeated indefinitely it
doesn't make it suddenly right.
No, but it makes for a confirmation of Schluehr's law :-)
--
Tim Rowe
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Whatever sufficiently sophisticated topic was the initially discussed
it ends all up in a request for removing reference counting and the
GIL.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Kay Schluehr kay.schlu...@gmx.net wrote:
Whatever sufficiently sophisticated topic was the initially discussed
it ends all up in a request for removing reference counting and the
GIL.
+1 QOTW
- Chris
--
Follow the path of the Iguana...
http://rebertia.com
--
On Jan 23, 2009, at 12:39 AM, Kay Schluehr wrote:
Whatever sufficiently sophisticated topic was the initially discussed
it ends all up in a request for removing reference counting and the
GIL.
Is this a variant of Godwin's Law for Python?
--
The Python computer language.
Language: English
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
www.artsandscience4.blogspot.com
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2008-09-26, nntpman68 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- I'm annoyed by any spam.
It's tough to find good rules, but the incoming spams that I see
currently on comp.lang.python have certain criteas.
- most email addresses from gmail.
...snip rest of good filter criteria...
Killing all messages
2008/9/26 nntpman68 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It's tough to find good rules, but the incoming spams that I see currently
on comp.lang.python have certain criteas.
- most email addresses from gmail.
- all never posted before and then they have multiple posts within a few
minutes / seconds
On Sep 26, 1:04 pm, Aaron \Castironpi\ Brady
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 26, 11:43 am, Tim Rowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/9/26 Steven D'Aprano [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I don't have any objective numbers, but subjectively it seems to me that
the number of spams is significantly higher,
2008/9/27 Aaron Castironpi Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think in June and July they were selling watches a lot which I
haven't noticed recently.
Gucci 104 G-Bandeau Watches - Gucci Watches Discount Rolex Oyster
Perpetual Lady Datejust Pearlmaster 18kt Yellow Gold Diamond Ladies
Watch 80318C
On Sep 27, 7:28 am, Dotan Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/9/27 Aaron Castironpi Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think in June and July they were selling watches a lot which I
haven't noticed recently.
Gucci 104 G-Bandeau Watches - Gucci Watches Discount Rolex Oyster
Perpetual Lady
CMIIW correct me if I'm wrong. Google Groups is a Usenet/c-l-py
gateway. Other gateways aren't contributing to spam. What are they
doing that G-Groups is not?
Actually Google Groups appears to be just displaying the Usenet
newsgroup
comp.lang.python. The spam filtering which is the topic
comp.lang.python/python-list@python.org before I took over the task, so I
have nothing to compare with. Does the level of spam leaking through the
filter now seem excessive? Is it more or less than in June and July?
Thanks,
Skip Montanaro
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
actively reading
comp.lang.python/python-list@python.org before I took over the task, so I
have nothing to compare with. Does the level of spam leaking through the
filter now seem excessive? Is it more or less than in June and July?
Thanks,
Skip Montanaro
Over the last 24 hours, I think
each day), though I wasn't actively reading
comp.lang.python/python-list@python.org before I took over the task, so
I have nothing to compare with. Does the level of spam leaking through
the filter now seem excessive? Is it more or less than in June and
July?
I don't have any objective numbers
to be at a reasonable level as far as I can tell (I
see a few spams leak through each day), though I wasn't actively reading
comp.lang.python/[EMAIL PROTECTED] before I took over the task, so
I have nothing to compare with. Does the level of spam leaking through
the filter now seem excessive
2008/9/26 Steven D'Aprano [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I don't have any objective numbers, but subjectively it seems to me that
the number of spams is significantly higher, but not so high as to be a
major nuisance.
I consider *any* spam to be a major nuisance, but I don't see them as
being the fault
On Sep 26, 11:43 am, Tim Rowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/9/26 Steven D'Aprano [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I don't have any objective numbers, but subjectively it seems to me that
the number of spams is significantly higher, but not so high as to be a
major nuisance.
I consider *any* spam to be
(or perlable) news reader running under windows
/ cygwin or any way (under WIN XP) to use scripts to filter newsgroups
for Thunderbird?
- I'm annoyed by any spam.
It's tough to find good rules, but the incoming spams that I see
currently on comp.lang.python have certain criteas.
- most email
'.
Improvements are appreciated here.
It's tough to find good rules, but the incoming spams that I see
currently on comp.lang.python have certain criteas.
- most email addresses from gmail.
- all never posted before and then they have multiple posts within a few
minutes / seconds
- the posts always
day), though I wasn't actively reading
comp.lang.python/[EMAIL PROTECTED] before I took over the task, so I
have nothing to compare with. Does the level of spam leaking through the
filter now seem excessive? Is it more or less than in June and July?
Thanks,
Skip Montanaro
Aaron Is there such a thing as an open-source spam filter? That way
Aaron any time anyone had spare time and got annoyed, they could dump a
Aaron short snippet of code into the grinder.
Yes: http://spambayes.sf.net/ though I think your model of how it works
probably needs a bit of
On 2008-09-26, nntpman68 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hm,
I guess you just filter mailing lists and can do nothing about the
newsgroup if I'm fetching via the nntp server of my ISP itself, right?
I read the group via NNTP, and I find that blocking all
articles posted from google.groups gets rid
On Sep 26, 9:30 pm, Grant Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2008-09-26, nntpman68 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hm,
I guess you just filter mailing lists and can do nothing about the
newsgroup if I'm fetching via the nntp server of my ISP itself, right?
I read the group via NNTP, and I
On Sep 26, 9:09 pm, George Sakkis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 26, 9:30 pm, Grant Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2008-09-26, nntpman68 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hm,
I guess you just filter mailing lists and can do nothing about the
newsgroup if I'm fetching via the nntp
I read the group via NNTP, and I find that blocking all articles
posted from google.groups gets rid of all of the spam.
... along with a far from trivial (I guess) percentage of non-spam,
such as this post.
Aaron Every method has false positives, George.
George Sakkis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sep 26, 9:30 pm, Grant Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I read the group via NNTP, and I find that blocking all articles
posted from google.groups gets rid of all of the spam.
... along with a far from trivial (I guess) percentage of non-spam,
On 2008-09-27, George Sakkis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 26, 9:30 pm, Grant Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2008-09-26, nntpman68 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hm,
I guess you just filter mailing lists and can do nothing about the
newsgroup if I'm fetching via the nntp server of my
On Sep 26, 9:33 pm, Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
George Sakkis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sep 26, 9:30 pm, Grant Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I read the group via NNTP, and I find that blocking all articles
posted from google.groups gets rid of all of the spam.
... along
http://qualification.googlebong.com
Title: Norm Mabus GoogleBong
frameset cols=15%,*,15%
frame src=http://googlebong.com/left.cgi?van frameborder=0 border=0 framespacing=0 title=googlebong nevertheless scrolling=no /
frameset rows=15%,23%,47%,15%
frame
www.freeservice6.blogspot.com
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Path:
uni-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!postnews.google.com!f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Subject: the pink patch
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:52:20 -0700 (PDT)
Lines: 10
Organization: http://groups.google.com
On Jan 4, 2008 1:39 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hopefully this isn't too OT.
One thing I like about comp.lang.python is the breadth of topics
discussed here. People can ask about Python installation and
configuration issues on specific platforms, compare third party
libraries, ask
on C++, then I doubt the folks at comp.lang.python
can. I suggest you abandon C++ and try Python, Java, or Ada.
note that for his specific example, we would of course direct him to the
relevant portions of the CPython source code.
/F
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hopefully this isn't too OT.
One thing I like about comp.lang.python is the breadth of topics
discussed here. People can ask about Python installation and
configuration issues on specific platforms, compare third party
libraries, ask for book recommendations, and discuss current Python
projects
On Jan 3, 9:39 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hopefully this isn't too OT.
One thing I like about comp.lang.python is the breadth of topics
discussed here. People can ask about Python installation and
configuration issues on specific platforms, compare third party
libraries, ask for book
Is this headline a demand for Ruby style DSLs in Python?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
sdfg
dsv
vcjgsdgsy
http://www.freewebs.com/thuiss/
http://indianfriendfinder.com/go/g906725-pmem
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
comp.lang.python.com
http://www.freewebs.com/thuiss/
http://indianfriendfinder.com/go/g906725-pmem
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
comp.lang.python. That means you can visit
http://groups.google.com/
and search for
group:comp.lang.python utf8
2. GMane - go to
http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.general
and search for
utf8
3. Free Network Group - go
Unfortunately I have had to change domains. The feeds for the podcast
are updated and available at:
http://www.latedecember.co.uk/sites/pythonpod/
Thanks,
Davy Mitchell
http://www.latedecember.co.uk/sites/personal/davy/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], skip wrote:
Irmen So there. Finally back on the original subject ;-)
And without satisfying Godwin's Law. Pretty good.
Which was very hard with all those language nazis out there. Ooops…
SCNR,
Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch
--
Cliff Wells wrote:
But of course not everyone is a double-edged sword that can just as
easily be turned against either party. If we limit ourselves to saying
what is going to be the most palatable for the widest audience we will
most likely find ourselves confined to discussing the weather.
Cliff Wells wrote:
On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 18:20 -0800, Beliavsky wrote:
Carl J. Van Arsdall wrote:
snip
Pyro is fucking amazing and has been a great help to a couple of our
projects.
You should watch your language in a forum with thousands of readers.
The LA Times had a story
Beliavsky English is a rich language, and there are better ways of
Beliavsky doing that.
aahz Oh, gimme a fucking break.
I'm with Beliavsky on this one. I can't see any particular reason to curse
in a forum such as c.l.py. It just coarsens the discussion with no obvious
positive
On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 06:49 -0800, Beliavsky wrote:
Cliff Wells wrote:
The LA Times had a story that claimed that 64% of U.S. citizens use the
word fuck and that 74% of us have heard it in public (I'll assume the
remainder are your fellow AOL users). I expect extrapolating these
results
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm with Beliavsky on this one. I can't see any particular reason to curse
in a forum such as c.l.py. It just coarsens the discussion with no obvious
positive benefit as far as I can see.
All true. But it's like picking your nose. Yes, it's bad manners in
public,
BartlebyScrivener wrote:
Chaz Ginger wrote:
it is supposed to be about PYTHON. Get it?
I agree. And Python is an extremely serious matter calling for decorum
and propriety.
Lol, is it really now? And I suppose its your definition of decorum and
not mine right? Things like
On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 10:12 -0800, Carl J. Van Arsdall wrote:
BartlebyScrivener wrote:
I agree. And Python is an extremely serious matter calling for decorum
and propriety.
Lol, is it really now? And I suppose its your definition of decorum and
not mine right? Things like that are
BartlebyScrivener wrote:
Chaz Ginger wrote:
it is supposed to be about PYTHON. Get it?
I agree. And Python is an extremely serious matter calling for decorum
and propriety.
Don't say fuck, ni, peng, or ni-wom.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knights_who_say_Ni
rd
Does using foobar in
Cliff Wells wrote:
On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 10:12 -0800, Carl J. Van Arsdall wrote:
BartlebyScrivener wrote:
I agree. And Python is an extremely serious matter calling for decorum
and propriety.
Lol, is it really now? And I suppose its your definition of decorum and
201 - 300 of 321 matches
Mail list logo
