Are there any that aren't persistent?
SQLite -- when opening a memory database rather than giving it a
physical file. {I'm a tad too busy to look up the format of the memory
parameter, but it shouldn't be too difficult to find it}
What? If I wanted to code string literals, I'd use
anydbm and dictionary{} seem like they both have a single key and key
value.
Can't you put more information into a DBM file or link tables? I just
don't see the benefit except for the persistent storage.
d= dbm.open('c:\\temp\\mydb.dat','n')
It has the following interface (key and data are
On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 06:49 -0700, davidj411 wrote:
anydbm and dictionary{} seem like they both have a single key and key
value.
Can't you put more information into a DBM file or link tables? I just
don't see the benefit except for the persistent storage.
Persistent storage /is/ the benefit.
davidj411 wrote:
anydbm and dictionary{} seem like they both have a single key and key
value.
Can't you put more information into a DBM file or link tables? I just
don't see the benefit except for the persistent storage.
Except for the persistent storage, that insignificant feature... ;) Well
Persistent storage /is/ the benefit. If you want to store relational
data, you should use a relational database.
Thanks, that makes sense. Are there any local relational databases
available to python that don't require a server backend?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 10:58 AM, davidj411 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, that makes sense. Are there any local relational databases
available to python that don't require a server backend?
sqlite
http://www.sqlite.org/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Thanks, that makes sense. Are there any local relational databases
available to python that don't require a server backend?
sqlite
http://www.sqlite.org/
Are there any that aren't persistent?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
