[George Sakkis]
> I would suggest SCons (http://www.scons.org/), a modern
> make/automake/autoconf replacement that uses python for its
> configuration files instead of yet another cryptic half-baked
> mini-language or XML.
Python might not be the most legible way to describe what a Makefile
has
George Sakkis wrote:
> "mg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Hello
>>
>>I work on an finite element framework and Python bindings have been
>>developped.
>>Actually, we use Boost.Build as build system but we would like to change
>>it.
>>
>>We have two kinds of problems. First, the framework is us
"mg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> I work on an finite element framework and Python bindings have been
> developped.
> Actually, we use Boost.Build as build system but we would like to change
> it.
>
> We have two kinds of problems. First, the framework is used for generate
> pure C++ app
Hello
I work on an finite element framework and Python bindings have been
developped.
Actually, we use Boost.Build as build system but we would like to change
it.
We have two kinds of problems. First, the framework is used for generate
pure C++ applications with static libraries ; second, the
