In [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Machin
wrote:
You may wish to put more restrictions on the separators ... I would be
suspicious of cases where dms[2] != dms[5]. What plausible separators
are there besides :? Why allow alphabetics? If there's a use case for
23h59m59s, that would have to be handled
John Machin wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know this is a trivial function, and I've now spent more time
searching for a surely-already-reinvented wheel than it would take to
reinvent it again, but just in case... is there a published,
open-source, function out there that takes a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Machin wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know this is a trivial function, and I've now spent more time
searching for a surely-already-reinvented wheel than it would take to
reinvent it again, but just in case... is there a published,
open-source,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I know this is a trivial function, and I've now spent more time
searching for a surely-already-reinvented wheel than it would take to
reinvent it again, but just in case... is there a published,
open-source, function out there that
I know this is a trivial function, and I've now spent more time
searching for a surely-already-reinvented wheel than it would take to
reinvent it again, but just in case... is there a published,
open-source, function out there that takes a string in the form of
hh:mm:ss (where hh is 00-23, mm is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know this is a trivial function, and I've now spent more time
searching for a surely-already-reinvented wheel than it would take to
reinvent it again, but just in case... is there a published,
open-source, function out there that takes a string in the form of
On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 20:18 -0700, John Machin wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know this is a trivial function, and I've now spent more time
searching for a surely-already-reinvented wheel than it would take to
reinvent it again, but just in case... is there a published,
open-source,
