[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 5, 12:26 am, Gabriel Genellina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5 feb, 03:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some timing stats: On Windows XP, Python 3.0a2.
(...)
Are threads an OS bottleneck?
I don't understand your threading issues, but I would not use 3.0a2
for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Multi-threaded control flow is a worthwhile priority.
It is? That's totally new to me. Given the fact that threads don't scale
I highly doubt your claim, too.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Feb 5, 5:22 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some iterables and control loops can be multithreaded. Worries that
it takes a syntax change.
for X in A:
def f( x ):
normal suite( x )
start_new_thread( target= f, args= ( X, ) )
Perhaps a control-flow wrapper, or method on
On Feb 5, 6:11 pm, Christian Heimes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Multi-threaded control flow is a worthwhile priority.
It is? That's totally new to me. Given the fact that threads don't scale
I highly doubt your claim, too.
I would propose for X IN A for parallel and
Christian Heimes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Multi-threaded control flow is a worthwhile priority.
It is? That's totally new to me. Given the fact that threads don't scale
I highly doubt your claim, too.
There's plenty that can be done to automatically extract parallelism
from
On Feb 5, 1:21 am, Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:22:29 -0800, castironpi wrote:
Some iterables and control loops can be multithreaded. Worries that
it takes a syntax change.
for X in A:
def f( x ):
normal suite( x )
Some iterables and control loops can be multithreaded. Worries that
it takes a syntax change.
for X in A:
def f( x ):
normal suite( x )
start_new_thread( target= f, args= ( X, ) )
Perhaps a control-flow wrapper, or method on iterable.
@parallel
for X in A:
normal suite( X )
On Feb 4, 9:22 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some iterables and control loops can be multithreaded. Worries that
it takes a syntax change.
for X in A:
def f( x ):
normal suite( x )
start_new_thread( target= f, args= ( X, ) )
Perhaps a control-flow wrapper, or method on
On Feb 5, 12:26 am, Gabriel Genellina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5 feb, 03:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some timing stats: On Windows XP, Python 3.0a2.
[timing code, 10,000 calls]
[ f( X ) ]: 0.0210021106034
[ start_new_thread( f, X ) ]: 1.15759908033
[ Thread( f, X ).start() ]:
On 5 feb, 03:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some timing stats: On Windows XP, Python 3.0a2.
[timing code, 10,000 calls]
[ f( X ) ]: 0.0210021106034
[ start_new_thread( f, X ) ]: 1.15759908033
[ Thread( f, X ).start() ]: 1.85400099733
[ Thread( f, X ).start and .join() ]: 1.93716743329
Are
On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:22:29 -0800, castironpi wrote:
Some iterables and control loops can be multithreaded. Worries that
it takes a syntax change.
for X in A:
def f( x ):
normal suite( x )
start_new_thread( target= f, args= ( X, ) )
Perhaps a control-flow wrapper, or
11 matches
Mail list logo
