On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 7:11 AM, Nobody wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:08:27 -0400, geremy condra wrote:
>
>> I have written Haskell that runs faster than C, and Forth that runs
>> faster than C,
>
> Faster than *what* C, though?
Well, than the C it was replacing, which is admittedly not much
of
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:08:27 -0400, geremy condra wrote:
> I have written Haskell that runs faster than C, and Forth that runs
> faster than C,
Faster than *what* C, though?
With Haskell, there's seldom a significant performance hit for using
-fvia-C, so you would probably have been able to get
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 25/06/2010 22:25, Stephen Hansen wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Mark
>> Lawrencewrote:
>>
>>> On 25/06/2010 16:34, Stephen Hansen wrote:
>>>
>>> Python's slow, sure. But its in practice fast enough for an extremely
>>>
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 25/06/2010 22:25, Stephen Hansen wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Mark Lawrence> >wrote:
>>
>> On 25/06/2010 16:34, Stephen Hansen wrote:
>>>
>>> Python's slow, sure. But its in practice fast enough for an extremely
>>>
On 25/06/2010 22:25, Stephen Hansen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Mark Lawrencewrote:
On 25/06/2010 16:34, Stephen Hansen wrote:
Python's slow, sure. But its in practice fast enough for an extremely
broad
range of activities.
What?
What, what?
--S
Python is *NOT* slow,
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 25/06/2010 16:34, Stephen Hansen wrote:
>
> Python's slow, sure. But its in practice fast enough for an extremely
>> broad
>> range of activities.
>>
>>
> What?
>
What, what?
--S
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 25/06/2010 16:34, Stephen Hansen wrote:
Python's slow, sure. But its in practice fast enough for an extremely broad
range of activities.
What?
Kindest regards.
Mark Lawrence.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Peng Yu wrote:
> http://psyco.sourceforge.net/
>
> The above package can improve python program on 32 bit library. But I
> need to run on 64 bit library. Is there any other module that can help
> improving the performance of python on 64 bit?
>
This is a total as
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Tim Wintle wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 21:52 -0500, Peng Yu wrote:
>> http://psyco.sourceforge.net/
>>
>> The above package can improve python program on 32 bit library. But I
>> need to run on 64 bit library. Is there any other module that can help
>> improving
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 21:52 -0500, Peng Yu wrote:
> http://psyco.sourceforge.net/
>
> The above package can improve python program on 32 bit library. But I
> need to run on 64 bit library. Is there any other module that can help
> improving the performance of python on 64 bit?
As I understand it
http://psyco.sourceforge.net/
The above package can improve python program on 32 bit library. But I
need to run on 64 bit library. Is there any other module that can help
improving the performance of python on 64 bit?
--
Regards,
Peng
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
11 matches
Mail list logo
