Peter Otten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> you're wrong.
Indeed I am, sorry for the waste of time.
--
Pete Forman-./\.- Disclaimer: This post is originated
WesternGeco -./\.- by myself and does not represent
[EMAIL PROTECTED]-./\.- the opinion of Schlumb
Pete Forman wrote:
> I'm holding off installing Python 2.6, waiting for some packages to
> become available for it. I wonder if someone could tell me the best
> way to avoid future problems parsing decimal integers with leading
> zeros.
You can have multiple versions of python simultaneously.
I'm holding off installing Python 2.6, waiting for some packages to
become available for it. I wonder if someone could tell me the best
way to avoid future problems parsing decimal integers with leading
zeros.
>>> int('09')
9
That works in 2.5 but will break in 2.6 AFAIK as int() is being
change
