On 17/09/2010 17:55, Ethan Furman wrote:
MRAB wrote:
On 16/09/2010 00:23, Ethan Furman wrote:
I need some fresh eyes, or better brains, or both!
'next_item' is a generator, but it's just calling itself and discarding
the result. I think it should be yielding the results to its caller.
That
MRAB wrote:
On 17/09/2010 17:55, Ethan Furman wrote:
MRAB wrote:
On 16/09/2010 00:23, Ethan Furman wrote:
PS
My apologies if this shows up twice, I haven't seen my other post yet
and it's been 27 hours.
That's probably because you sent it directly to me.
That would explain it -- like I
I need some fresh eyes, or better brains, or both!
The expected debugging output is a list of names in alphabetical order
from each node (there are about 90 of them); what I am getting is this:
-- dbf.tables.Index.from_file('', r'aad13658_last_name_for_state.idx')
starting next_item call
On 16/09/2010 00:23, Ethan Furman wrote:
I need some fresh eyes, or better brains, or both!
The expected debugging output is a list of names in alphabetical order
from each node (there are about 90 of them); what I am getting is this:
-- dbf.tables.Index.from_file('',
