Tim Roberts wrote:
Xah Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Languages with Full Unicode Support
As far as i know, Java and JavaScript are languages with full, complete
unicode support. That is, they allow names to be defined using unicode.
(the JavaScript engine used by FireFox support
Dale King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim Roberts wrote:
Xah Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Languages with Full Unicode Support
As far as i know, Java and JavaScript are languages with full, complete
unicode support. That is, they allow names to be defined using unicode.
(the JavaScript engine
Oliver Bandel schrieb:
Matthias Blume wrote:
Tin Gherdanarra [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oliver Bandel wrote:
こんいちわ Xah-Lee san ;-)
Uhm, I'd guess that Xah is Chinese. Be careful
with such things in real life; Koreans might
beat you up for this. Stay alive!
And the Japanese might
Joachim Durchholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oliver Bandel schrieb:
Matthias Blume wrote:
Tin Gherdanarra [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oliver Bandel wrote:
こんいちわ Xah-Lee san ;-)
Uhm, I'd guess that Xah is Chinese. Be careful
with such things in real life; Koreans might
beat you up for
Pascal Bourguignon wrote:
[...]
(coerce (lschar :name LATIN) 'string)
-- ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
ÀÁÂÃÄÅÆÇÈÉÊËÌÍÎÏÐÑÒÓÔÕÖØÙÚÛÜÝÞßàáâãäåæçèéêëìíîïðñòóô
[...]
In what programming language/interpreter is this code?
--
Matthias Blume wrote:
Tin Gherdanarra [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oliver Bandel wrote:
こんいちわ Xah-Lee san ;-)
Uhm, I'd guess that Xah is Chinese. Be careful
with such things in real life; Koreans might
beat you up for this. Stay alive!
And the Japanese might beat him up, too. For
Oliver Bandel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oliver Bandel wrote:
こんいちわ Xah-Lee san ;-)
Uhm, I'd guess that Xah is Chinese. Be careful
with such things in real life; Koreans might
beat you up for this. Stay alive!
And the Japanese might beat him up, too. For butchering their
language. :-)
OK,
Chris Uppal schrieb:
Joachim Durchholz wrote:
This is implementation-defined in C. A compiler is allowed to accept
variable names with alphabetic Unicode characters outside of ASCII.
Hmm... that could would be nonportable, so C support for Unicode is
half-baked at best.
Since the
Chris Uppal schreef:
Since the interpretation of characters which are yet to be added to
Unicode is undefined (will they be digits, letters, operators,
symbol, punctuation ?), there doesn't seem to be any sane way
that a language could allow an unrestricted choice of Unicode in
Joachim Durchholz wrote:
Chris Uppal schrieb:
Joachim Durchholz wrote:
This is implementation-defined in C. A compiler is allowed to accept
variable names with alphabetic Unicode characters outside of ASCII.
Hmm... that could would be nonportable, so C support for Unicode is
half-baked at
Xah Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Languages with Full Unicode Support
As far as i know, Java and JavaScript are languages with full, complete
unicode support. That is, they allow names to be defined using unicode.
(the JavaScript engine used by FireFox support this)
As far as i know, here's few
Tim Roberts schrieb:
Xah Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
C ? No.
This is implementation-defined in C. A compiler is allowed to accept
variable names with alphabetic Unicode characters outside of ASCII.
Hmm... that could would be nonportable, so C support for Unicode is
half-baked at best.
Tim Roberts wrote:
Xah Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Languages with Full Unicode Support
As far as i know, Java and JavaScript are languages with full, complete
unicode support. That is, they allow names to be defined using unicode.
(the JavaScript engine used by FireFox support this)
As far
Joachim Durchholz wrote:
This is implementation-defined in C. A compiler is allowed to accept
variable names with alphabetic Unicode characters outside of ASCII.
Hmm... that could would be nonportable, so C support for Unicode is
half-baked at best.
Since the interpretation of characters
Note Followup-To: comp.lang.java.programmer
Chris Uppal wrote:
Since the interpretation of characters which are yet to be added to
Unicode is undefined (will they be digits, letters, operators, symbol,
punctuation ?), there doesn't seem to be any sane way that a language
could
allow an
Oliver Bandel wrote:
こんいちわ Xah-Lee san ;-)
Uhm, I'd guess that Xah is Chinese. Be careful
with such things in real life; Koreans might
beat you up for this. Stay alive!
Xah Lee wrote:
Languages with Full Unicode Support
As far as i know, Java and JavaScript are languages with full
Tin Gherdanarra [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oliver Bandel wrote:
こんいちわ Xah-Lee san ;-)
Uhm, I'd guess that Xah is Chinese. Be careful
with such things in real life; Koreans might
beat you up for this. Stay alive!
And the Japanese might beat him up, too. For butchering their
language. :-)
--
Oliver Bandel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xah Lee wrote:
As far as i know, Java and JavaScript are languages with full, complete
unicode support. That is, they allow names to be defined using unicode.
Can you explain what you mena with the names here
Languages with Full Unicode Support
As far as i know, Java and JavaScript are languages with full, complete
unicode support. That is, they allow names to be defined using unicode.
(the JavaScript engine used by FireFox support this)
As far as i know, here's few other lang's status:
C
Xah Lee wrote:
Lisps → No.
The Common Lisp spec (CLHS) doesn't require that implementations support
Unicode characters, but it doesn't forbid it and some implementations
support it, e.g. http://clisp.cons.org/impnotes.html
--
Frank Buss, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.frank-buss.de,
Xah Lee wrote:
Languages with Full Unicode Support
As far as i know, Java and JavaScript are languages with full, complete
unicode support. That is, they allow names to be defined using unicode.
(the JavaScript engine used by FireFox support this)
As far as i know, here's few other lang's
Xah Lee wrote:
If you know a lang that does full unicode support, please let me know.
Tcl. You may have to modify the source command to get it to default
to something other than the system encoding, but this is trivial in Tcl.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
Native Americans
こんいちわ Xah-Lee san ;-)
Xah Lee wrote:
Languages with Full Unicode Support
As far as i know, Java and JavaScript are languages with full, complete
unicode support. That is, they allow names to be defined using unicode.
Can you explain what you mena with the names here?
(the JavaScript
As far as i know, here's few other lang's status:
C → No.
I think C has the wchar type to handle larger values. And C++ has
std::wstring. So really, the support is there.
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/unicode.html#c
I think the problem is that most C/C++ coders don't care about unicode
24 matches
Mail list logo
