Wow, this message turned out to be *LONG*. And it also took a long time
to write. But I had fun with it, so ok. :-)
Michael Torrie wrote:
Recently a post that mentioned a recipe that extended subprocess to
allow killable processes caused me to do some thinking. Some of my
larger bash scripts
On Apr 24, 12:22 pm, Michael Torrie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
pipe([prog1,args],[prog2,args],...)
Any ideas on how I could design this?
There's a recipe on Activestate's Python Cookbook that does pretty
much this:
Allows arbitrary number of commands to be strung together with
each one feeding
Recently a post that mentioned a recipe that extended subprocess to
allow killable processes caused me to do some thinking. Some of my
larger bash scripts are starting to become a bit unwieldy (hundreds of
lines of code). Yet for many things bash just works out so well because
it is so close to
