On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> geremy condra writes:
>
>> You know, I've never been a part of a community in which the URL
>> format was the most contentious part of filing a bug report.
>
> Heck no, the bug report is already filed, and contentions about the bug
> report sh
On 13 Jun 2010 18:23:28 -0700
a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote:
> What's your cite that URLs never end with a period? AFAIK, that's
> perfectly valid by the rules.
Technically that may be true but when do you ever see one? If your
email client discards trailing periods I think you can expect i
geremy condra writes:
> You know, I've never been a part of a community in which the URL
> format was the most contentious part of filing a bug report.
Heck no, the bug report is already filed, and contentions about the bug
report should presumably be going into that report. This issue isn't
abo
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 19:05:28 -0700, geremy condra wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Ben Finney
> wrote:
>> a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) writes:
>>
>>> In article ,
>>> geremy condra wrote:
>>> >
>>> >Bug filed, http://bugs.python.org/issue8986.
[...]
> You know, I've never been a part
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) writes:
>
>> In article ,
>> geremy condra wrote:
>> >
>> >Bug filed, http://bugs.python.org/issue8986.
>>
>> Please don't put extraneous punctuation on URLs.
>
> The punctuation isn't extraneous; it's a necessary p
a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) writes:
> In article ,
> geremy condra wrote:
> >
> >Bug filed, http://bugs.python.org/issue8986.
>
> Please don't put extraneous punctuation on URLs.
The punctuation isn't extraneous; it's a necessary part of a natural
English sentence. That's where it belongs.
Bet
In article ,
D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
>On 13 Jun 2010 09:49:03 -0700
>a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote:
>>
>> Please don't put extraneous punctuation on URLs. That period is a valid
>> URL character, but it's invalid for this URL, and it's not obvious to the
>> reader whether the period should b
On 13 Jun 2010 09:49:03 -0700
a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote:
> >Bug filed, http://bugs.python.org/issue8986.
>
> Please don't put extraneous punctuation on URLs. That period is a valid
> URL character, but it's invalid for this URL, and it's not obvious to the
> reader whether the period shou
On Jun 13, 12:56 am, geremy condra wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
> > On 2010-06-12 17:49 , geremy condra wrote:
>
> >> In Python3.2, calling math.erfc with a value in [-27.2, -30) raises
> >> an OverflowError: math range error. This is inconsistent with the
> >> erf
In article ,
geremy condra wrote:
>
>Bug filed, http://bugs.python.org/issue8986.
Please don't put extraneous punctuation on URLs. That period is a valid
URL character, but it's invalid for this URL, and it's not obvious to the
reader whether the period should be part of the URL. URLs in gener
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 11:05 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 15:49:37 -0700, geremy condra wrote:
>
>> In Python3.2, calling math.erfc with a value in [-27.2, -30) raises an
>> OverflowError: math range error. This is inconsistent with the erfc
>> function from scipy (scipy.speci
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 15:49:37 -0700, geremy condra wrote:
> In Python3.2, calling math.erfc with a value in [-27.2, -30) raises an
> OverflowError: math range error. This is inconsistent with the erfc
> function from scipy (scipy.special.erfc) as well as with the C99
> function by the same name, bo
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
> On 2010-06-12 17:49 , geremy condra wrote:
>>
>> In Python3.2, calling math.erfc with a value in [-27.2, -30) raises
>> an OverflowError: math range error. This is inconsistent with the
>> erfc function from scipy (scipy.special.erfc) as well a
On 2010-06-12 17:49 , geremy condra wrote:
In Python3.2, calling math.erfc with a value in [-27.2, -30) raises
an OverflowError: math range error. This is inconsistent with the
erfc function from scipy (scipy.special.erfc) as well as with the C99
function by the same name, both of which return 2.
In Python3.2, calling math.erfc with a value in [-27.2, -30) raises
an OverflowError: math range error. This is inconsistent with the
erfc function from scipy (scipy.special.erfc) as well as with the C99
function by the same name, both of which return 2. I suspect that
this is the result of the cut
15 matches
Mail list logo
