Re: multiprocessing and accessing server's stdout

2010-06-02 Thread Bryan
Tim Arnold wrote: Hi, This is the setup I was asking about. I've got users using a python-written command line client. They're requesting services from a remote server that fires a LaTeX process. I want them to see the stdout from the LaTeX process. So what you really need is to capture the

Re: multiprocessing and accessing server's stdout

2010-06-02 Thread Bryan
I wrote: So what you really need is to capture the output of a command, in this case LaTeX, so you can copy it back to the client. You can do that with the subprocess module in the Python standard library. If the command generated so much output so fast that you felt the need to avoid the

Re: multiprocessing and accessing server's stdout

2010-06-01 Thread Tim Arnold
On May 28, 7:47 pm, Martin P. Hellwig martin.hell...@dcuktec.org wrote: On 05/28/10 21:44, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 15:41 +0100, Martin P. Hellwig wrote: On 05/28/10 13:17, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: cut You should be able to point it any any file-like object.  

Re: multiprocessing and accessing server's stdout

2010-05-28 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 08:36 -0700, Tim Arnold wrote: On May 26, 4:52 pm, Adam Tauno Williams awill...@whitemice.org wrote: On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 11:47 -0700, Tim Arnold wrote: Hi, I'm using multiprocessing's BaseManager to create a server on one machine and a client on another. The

Re: multiprocessing and accessing server's stdout

2010-05-28 Thread Martin P. Hellwig
On 05/28/10 13:17, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: cut You should be able to point it any any file-like object. But, again, why? If you have the data in the process why send it to stdout and redirect it. Why not just send the data to the client directly? Well you might want to multiplex it to

Re: multiprocessing and accessing server's stdout

2010-05-28 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 15:41 +0100, Martin P. Hellwig wrote: On 05/28/10 13:17, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: cut You should be able to point it any any file-like object. But, again, why? If you have the data in the process why send it to stdout and redirect it. Why not just send the data

Re: multiprocessing and accessing server's stdout

2010-05-28 Thread Martin P. Hellwig
On 05/28/10 21:44, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 15:41 +0100, Martin P. Hellwig wrote: On 05/28/10 13:17, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: cut You should be able to point it any any file-like object. But, again, why? If you have the data in the process why send it to stdout and

Re: multiprocessing and accessing server's stdout

2010-05-27 Thread Tim Arnold
On May 26, 4:52 pm, Adam Tauno Williams awill...@whitemice.org wrote: On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 11:47 -0700, Tim Arnold wrote: Hi, I'm using multiprocessing's BaseManager to create a server on one machine and a client on another. The client fires a request and the server does some work, the

multiprocessing and accessing server's stdout

2010-05-26 Thread Tim Arnold
Hi, I'm using multiprocessing's BaseManager to create a server on one machine and a client on another. The client fires a request and the server does some work, the result of which ends up on a shared file system that both the client and server can see. However, I need the client machine to see

Re: multiprocessing and accessing server's stdout

2010-05-26 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 11:47 -0700, Tim Arnold wrote: Hi, I'm using multiprocessing's BaseManager to create a server on one machine and a client on another. The client fires a request and the server does some work, the result of which ends up on a shared file system that both the client and