Re: named tuple mutability

Ben Finney a écrit : Bruno Desthuilliers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: May we agree to disagree here - unless we don't ? Absolutely not, except where not applicable. and vice versa. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: named tuple mutability

Bruno Desthuilliers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > May we agree to disagree here - unless we don't ? Absolutely not, except where not applicable. -- \ "I always wanted to be somebody. I see now that I should have | `\ been more specific." -- Lily Tomlin | _

Re: named tuple mutability

Ben Finney a écrit : "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: On 14 mai, 18:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm concerned over the future of Python. Should tuples be named? Obviously not, unless they should. Clearly they should, unless not. May we agree to disagree here - unless we d

Re: named tuple mutability

On May 14, 6:21 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On May 14, 12:41 pm, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Should tuples be named? > > > Yes. > > Good; they're named sequences. Can anyone make sling-shots of words? What's the splatter? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pyth

Re: named tuple mutability

On May 14, 12:41 pm, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Should tuples be named? > > Yes. Good; they're named sequences. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: named tuple mutability

On May 14, 5:28 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On May 14, 5:01 pm, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On 14 mai, 18:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > I'm concerned over the future of Python.  Should tuples be named? > > > > Obvious

Re: named tuple mutability

On May 14, 5:01 pm, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On 14 mai, 18:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I'm concerned over the future of Python.  Should tuples be named? > > > Obviously not, unless they should. > > Clearly they should, unless

Re: named tuple mutability

"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 14 mai, 18:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I'm concerned over the future of Python. Should tuples be named? > > Obviously not, unless they should. Clearly they should, unless not. -- \ “It is seldom that liberty of any kind

Re: named tuple mutability

On 14 mai, 18:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm concerned over the future of Python. Should tuples be named? Obviously not, unless they should. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: named tuple mutability

On May 14, 1:04 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On May 14, 12:41 pm, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Should tuples be named? > > > Yes. > > Not clearly should.  Sequences ought be.  If you're on the right time > for both, can't the library hold the B? On the web, you can. Both

Re: named tuple mutability

On May 14, 12:41 pm, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Should tuples be named? > > Yes. Not clearly should. Sequences ought be. If you're on the right time for both, can't the library hold the B? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: named tuple mutability

> Should tuples be named? Yes. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

named tuple mutability

I'm concerned over the future of Python. Should tuples be named? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list