Istvan Albert wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > For example it resembles the icon for text files.
> >
> > This is intentional: to make it obvious that .py files are the
> > readable, editable scripts, contrasting with .pyc's binary gunk -
>
> I think this is a mistake, it does not seem obi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > For example it resembles the icon for text files.
>
> This is intentional: to make it obvious that .py files are the
> readable, editable scripts, contrasting with .pyc's binary gunk -
I think this is a mistake, it does not seem obious, all it does is just
blends in
Istvan Albert wrote:
> But these new icons are too large, too blocky and too pastel.
Hooray! Glad to see *someone* doesn't like 'em, I'll expect a few more
when b1 hits. :-)
Although I can't really see 'large', 'blocky' or 'pastel'... they're
the same size and shape as other Windows document ico
I've been using the new python icons for windows for about two weeks
now and I must say they've turned out to be far less functional than I
thought. From purely visual standpoint the new icons look better, the
old ones had a certain level of 'cuteness' associated to them ..
