Julieta Shem writes:
[...]
> I agree. By the way, I once read or watched an interview with Guido van
> Rossum and and he was asked why not to tail-call optimize Python and the
> answer he gave --- IIRC --- was that tail-call optimization makes it
> harder for a beginner to understand a stack
Greg Ewing writes:
> On 8/11/23 2:26 pm, Julieta Shem wrote:
>> For the first time I'm trying to write a tail-recursive
>> square-and-multiply and, even though it /seems/ to work, I'm not happy
>> with what I wrote and I don't seem to understand it so well.
>
> Step
On 8/11/23 2:26 pm, Julieta Shem wrote:
For the first time I'm trying to write a tail-recursive
square-and-multiply and, even though it /seems/ to work, I'm not happy
with what I wrote and I don't seem to understand it so well.
Stepping back a bit, why do you feel the need to write this
tail
On 11/7/23 18:26, Julieta Shem via Python-list wrote:
> For the first time I'm trying to write a tail-recursive
> square-and-multiply and, even though it /seems/ to work, I'm not happy
> with what I wrote and I don't seem to understand it so well.
>
> --8<-
For the first time I'm trying to write a tail-recursive
square-and-multiply and, even though it /seems/ to work, I'm not happy
with what I wrote and I don't seem to understand it so well.
--8<---cut here---start->8---
def sam(b, e, m, acc = 1):
if
