Emin.shopper Martinian.shopper wrote:
Is there any hope of a parallel processing toolkit being
incorporated into the python standard library? I've seen a wide
variety of toolkits each with various features and limitations.
Unfortunately, each has its own API. For coarse-grained
Robert Kern wrote:
The problem is that for SQL databases, there is a substantial API that they
can
all share. The implementations are primarily differentiated by other factors
like speed, in-memory or on-disk, embedded or server, the flavor of SQL, etc.
and only secondarily differentiated by
Stefan Behnel wrote:
Well, there is one parallel processing API that already *is* part of
stdlib:
the threading module. So the processing module would fit just nicely into the
idea of a standard library.
Don't you forget the select module and its siblings for I/O bound
concurrency?
Christian
Christian Heimes wrote:
Stefan Behnel wrote:
Well, there is one parallel processing API that already *is* part of
stdlib:
the threading module. So the processing module would fit just nicely into the
idea of a standard library.
Don't you forget the select module and its siblings for I/O
On Dec 27, 2007 4:13 PM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Emin.shopper Martinian.shopper wrote:
If not, is there any hope of something like
the db-api for coarse grained parallelism (i.e, a common API that
different toolkits can support)?
The problem is that for SQL databases, there
I think we are a ways off from the point where any of the solutions
are well used, matured, and trusted to promote as a Python standard
module. I'd love to see it happen, but even worse than it never
happening is it happening too soon.
On Dec 27, 2007 8:52 AM, Emin.shopper Martinian.shopper
Stefan Behnel wrote:
Robert Kern wrote:
The problem is that for SQL databases, there is a substantial API that they
can
all share. The implementations are primarily differentiated by other factors
like speed, in-memory or on-disk, embedded or server, the flavor of SQL, etc.
and only
Emin.shopper Martinian.shopper wrote:
On Dec 27, 2007 4:13 PM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My recommendation to you is to pick one of the smaller
implementations that
solves the problems in front of you. Read and understand that module
so
Dear Experts,
Is there any hope of a parallel processing toolkit being incorporated into
the python standard library? I've seen a wide variety of toolkits each with
various features and limitations. Unfortunately, each has its own API. For
coarse-grained parallelism, I suspect I'd be pretty happy
Emin.shopper Martinian.shopper wrote:
Dear Experts,
Is there any hope of a parallel processing toolkit being incorporated
into the python standard library? I've seen a wide variety of toolkits
each with various features and limitations. Unfortunately, each has its
own API. For
10 matches
Mail list logo
