Re: prove

Lucas Prado Melo a écrit : Hello, How could I prove to someone that python accepts this syntax using the documentation (I couldn't find it anywhere): classname.functionname(objectname) Why do you need the documentation ? Just fire up your python shell and hack a QD example: Python 2.5.1

Re: prove

Lucas Prado Melo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, How could I prove to someone that python accepts this syntax using the documentation (I couldn't find it anywhere): classname.functionname(objectname) Language reference, mostly section 5.3 Primaries call ::= primary

Re: prove

On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 5:32 AM, Bruno Desthuilliers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why do you need the documentation ? Just fire up your python shell and hack a QD example: I agree. I said it to this person, but he insisted I should use documentation... --

Re: prove

Thanks for all the answers. I bet I will convince this guy! -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

prove

Hello, How could I prove to someone that python accepts this syntax using the documentation (I couldn't find it anywhere): classname.functionname(objectname) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: prove

classname.functionname(objectname) Do you mean something like this? class myclass: @staticmethod def myfunction(myobject): pass myobject = None myclass.myfunction(myobject) If so, then you want to check the staticmethod decorator, described here:

Re: prove

Lucas Prado Melo wrote: How could I prove to someone that python accepts this syntax using the documentation (I couldn't find it anywhere): classname.functionname(objectname) TUtorial 9.3.4, method objects What exactly happens when a method is called? You may have noticed that x.f

Re: prove

Thanks Marco, this is just what I was looking for. On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 11:02 AM, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: classname.functionname(objectname) Do you mean something like this? class myclass: @staticmethod def myfunction(myobject): pass myobject = None

Re: prove

On May 8, 10:50 am, Lucas Prado Melo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, How could I prove to someone that python accepts this syntax using the documentation (I couldn't find it anywhere): classname.functionname(objectname) It's in the language reference, section 3.2 The standard type hierarchy

Re: Take the $million challenge: Prove 911 conspriracy theorists are wrong

I found this nice dialog on the internet: = Well, if you want to convice me, just answer these questions: If you can prove that the official explanation is correct, what's keeping you from collecting a MILLION dollars? Even if you're too wealthy to bother

Re: Take the $million challenge: Prove 911 conspriracy theorists are wrong

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I found this nice dialog on the internet: Doubtless, but why did you choose to share it with a bunch of news groups which aren't related to the subject? Aandi Inston [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.quite.com Please support usenet!

Re: Take the $million challenge: Prove 911 conspriracy theorists are wrong

Do you mean to say that the dimension to pursue truth and freedom from deception lack for people using TeX? or they must not be informed of it? BTW, Mr Siegman from Stanford of Yatches, whats your take on Neturei Karta ? If I am making a guess based on the sample space I have seen in elite

Re: Take the $million challenge: Prove 911 conspriracy theorists are wrong

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you mean to say that the dimension to pursue truth and freedom from deception lack for people using TeX? or they must not be informed of it? What kind of dimension is needed to pursue

Re: Take the $million challenge: Prove 911 conspriracy theorists are wrong

://www.dexrow.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I found this nice dialog on the internet: = Well, if you want to convice me, just answer these questions: If you can prove that the official explanation is correct, what's keeping you from collecting a MILLION