Zooko O'Whielacronx wrote:
I like pyflakes. I haven't tried the others. I made a setuptools
plugin named "setuptools_pyflakes". If you install that package, then
"python ./setup.py flakes" runs pyflakes on your package.
Regards,
Thanks Zooko
I decided to give all of them a try :-)
Esmai
I like pyflakes. I haven't tried the others. I made a setuptools
plugin named "setuptools_pyflakes". If you install that package,
then "python ./setup.py flakes" runs pyflakes on your package.
Regards,
Zooko
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Aahz wrote:
> In article <874owf4gky.fsf...@benfinney.id.au>,
> Ben Finney wrote:
>>a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) writes:
>>>
>>> Second, you can configure pylint to respect your personal style
>>
>>How? I haven't seen any decent documentation on doing so.
>
> Act
In article <874owf4gky.fsf...@benfinney.id.au>,
Ben Finney wrote:
>a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) writes:
>>
>> Second, you can configure pylint to respect your personal style
>
>How? I haven't seen any decent documentation on doing so.
Actually, I don't know how, I'm just repeating what was claime
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Ben Finney
> wrote:
> a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) writes:
>
> > Second, you can configure pylint to respect your personal style
>
> How? I haven't seen any decent documentation on doing so.
>
> --
> \ “When we call others dogmatic, what we really object
a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) writes:
> Second, you can configure pylint to respect your personal style
How? I haven't seen any decent documentation on doing so.
--
\ “When we call others dogmatic, what we really object to is |
`\ their holding dogmas that are different from our own
Colin J. Williams wrote:
> Esmail wrote:
> > What is the consensus of the Python community regarding these
> > code checkers?
> >
> > In particular, are the stylistic recommendations that
> > pylint makes considered sensible/valid?
>
> pylint seems a bit heavy handled, a bit
> too much PEP 8
In article , Colin J. Williams wrote:
>
>pylint seems a bit heavy handled, a bit too much PEP 8, which was
>intended as a guide, rather than a prescription.
That's half-true on both counts:
First of all, any new library must be PEP 8-compliant for submission to
the standard library, so PEP 8 is
Colin J. Williams wrote:
Esmail wrote:
What is the consensus of the Python community regarding these
code checkers?
In particular, are the stylistic recommendations that
pylint makes considered sensible/valid?
pylint seems a bit heavy handled, a bit too much PEP 8,
Just having used this fo
Esmail wrote:
What is the consensus of the Python community regarding these
code checkers?
In particular, are the stylistic recommendations that
pylint makes considered sensible/valid?
pylint seems a bit heavy handled, a bit
too much PEP 8, which was intended as a
guide, rather than a prescr
Esmail writes:
> In particular, are the stylistic recommendations that pylint makes
> considered sensible/valid?
You can configure pylint extensively, to follow *your* chosen style
recommendations. (Though I haven't found good documentation on how
that's done.)
> Are there any other tools you c
On Apr 21, 2009, at 9:11 PM, Esmail wrote:
What is the consensus of the Python community regarding these
code checkers?
You're assuming there is a consensus. =)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
What is the consensus of the Python community regarding these
code checkers?
In particular, are the stylistic recommendations that
pylint makes considered sensible/valid?
Are there any other tools you consider essential to Python
development?
Thanks.
Esmail
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/li
13 matches
Mail list logo
