On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 23:18:15 -0800, rusi wrote:
On Nov 28, 9:37 am, alex23 wuwe...@gmail.com wrote:
With that approach in mind, I've never had any real issues using pip,
virtualenv etc for managing my development environment.
Yes that is in a way my point also: we discuss (things like)
On Nov 28, 4:42 pm, Steven D'Aprano steve
+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
We don't chase people down on the street and lecture them about the
problems we think they are having, we answer questions about ACTUAL
problems that they have experienced and asking about.
... ever question gets
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 05:14:27 -0800, rusi wrote:
On Nov 28, 4:42 pm, Steven D'Aprano steve
+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
We don't chase people down on the street and lecture them about the
problems we think they are having, we answer questions about ACTUAL
problems that they have
On 2011-11-28 14:14, rusi wrote:
On Nov 28, 4:42 pm, Steven D'Apranosteve
+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
We don't chase people down on the street and lecture them about the
problems we think they are having, we answer questions about ACTUAL
problems that they have experienced and
Agreed. I recently gave Haskell a go, and it was remarkable how
similar the package management is to Python's.
How well does the new packaging (set for release in Python 3.3?)
module deal with the problems?
With a better package management system, the half of the standard
library that nobody
On 27Nov2011 23:54, Matt Joiner anacro...@gmail.com wrote:
| Agreed. I recently gave Haskell a go, and it was remarkable how
| similar the package management is to Python's.
|
| How well does the new packaging (set for release in Python 3.3?)
| module deal with the problems?
|
| With a better
On Nov 28, 2:46 am, Cameron Simpson c...@zip.com.au wrote:
On 27Nov2011 23:54, Matt Joiner anacro...@gmail.com wrote:
| Agreed. I recently gave Haskell a go, and it was remarkable how
| similar the package management is to Python's.
|
| How well does the new packaging (set for release in
In article
46c11371-411a-4ba0-89b9-967e2f83e...@k5g2000pre.googlegroups.com,
rusi rustompm...@gmail.com wrote:
If the linguistic features were all that mattered Lisp would be the
king of languages today
(that (is (one (of (the (most (absurd (statements (I've (read (in (a
(long
rusi rustompm...@gmail.com wrote:
While Ive never seen anything as ridiculous as the debian-rails in the
python world, its still always a hobson choice: use a deb package
that will cleanly install, deinstall, upgrade etc but is out of date
or use a fresh and shiny egg that messes up the
On Nov 28, 9:37 am, alex23 wuwe...@gmail.com wrote:
With that approach in mind, I've never had any real issues using pip,
virtualenv etc for managing my development environment.
Yes that is in a way my point also: we discuss (things like) pip,
virtualenv etc too little.
Try working out the
it's an all-out disgrace.
when is python going to get a decent module distribution system???
and don't tell me to do it myself: it's clear that the sorry
situation we have now is precisely that too many programmers without
the requisite expertise or policy-making authority have decided to
pitch
On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 13:40:28 +, kj wrote:
it's an all-out disgrace.
when is python going to get a decent module distribution system???
Python 4.3, scheduled for March 2038. It's been ready for a few years
now, and a small secret coterie of privileged developers have been using
it for
On Sat, 2011-11-26 at 14:22 +, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
when is python going to get a decent module distribution system???
Python 4.3, scheduled for March 2038. It's been ready for a few years
now, and a small secret coterie of privileged developers have been
using
it for their own
On Nov 26, 6:40 pm, kj no.em...@please.post wrote:
it's an all-out disgrace.
when is python going to get a decent module distribution system???
and don't tell me to do it myself: it's clear that the sorry
situation we have now is precisely that too many programmers without
the requisite
On Nov 26, 11:28 am, rusi rustompm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 26, 6:40 pm, kj no.em...@please.post wrote:
The only thing I disagree about is that GvR is 'top' enough to handle
this.
For a concrete example of how uninterested Mr. Van Rossum has become,
take a look at the gawd awful state of
15 matches
Mail list logo
