On May 20, 2:08 am, Peter Otten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > if i want o test:
> > if a == 5 and b ==5 and c==5 ... z==5
>
> > is there some synctactic suagr for this?
>
> > rather than maiking one of my own i mean, something built-in like:
> > if a,b,c... z == 5:
>
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> if i want o test:
> if a == 5 and b ==5 and c==5 ... z==5
>
> is there some synctactic suagr for this?
>
> rather than maiking one of my own i mean, something built-in like:
> if a,b,c... z == 5:
if all(x == 5 for x in a,b,c,...):
print "yep"
Peter
--
http://mai
On Mon, 19 May 2008 20:36:45 -0700, notnorwegian wrote:
> if i want o test:
> if a == 5 and b ==5 and c==5 ... z==5
>
> is there some synctactic suagr for this?
>
> rather than maiking one of my own i mean, something built-in like:
> if a,b,c... z == 5:
Since Python 2.5 there's `all()`:
In [81
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if i want o test:
if a == 5 and b ==5 and c==5 ... z==5
is there some synctactic suagr for this?
rather than maiking one of my own i mean, something built-in like:
if a,b,c... z == 5:
How about:
if 5 == a == b == c == ... z:
...
--Scott David Daniels
[EM
if i want o test:
if a == 5 and b ==5 and c==5 ... z==5
is there some synctactic suagr for this?
rather than maiking one of my own i mean, something built-in like:
if a,b,c... z == 5:
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
