Lie Ryan wrote:
cut
But ruby don't bite...
cut
Neither does a python, it is a constrictor, meaning it has a firm grip
on the modules imported :-)
--
mph
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Dear sir,
I would like to share a benchmark I did. The computer used was a
2160MHz Intel Core Duo w/ 2000MB of 667MHz DDR2 SDRAM running MAC OS
10.5.6 and a lots of software running (a typical developer
workstation).
Python benchmark:
HAMBURGUESA:benchmark sam$ echo 1+1 bench.py
On 2009-03-12, Sam Ettessoc sami...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear sir,
[Rather odd benchmark troll elided.]
Sam Ettessoc
p.s. I have no affiliation with ruby or python devloppement team.
A fact for which I'm sure both communities are grateful.
--
Grant Edwards grante
Dear sir,
I would like to share a benchmark I did. The computer used was a
2160MHz Intel Core Duo w/ 2000MB of 667MHz DDR2 SDRAM running MAC OS
10.5.6 and a lots of software running (a typical developer
workstation).
Python benchmark:
HAMBURGUESA:benchmark sam$ echo 1+1 bench.py
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Sam Ettessoc sami...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to share a benchmark I did. The computer used was a
2160MHz Intel Core Duo w/ 2000MB of 667MHz DDR2 SDRAM running MAC OS
10.5.6 and a lots of software running (a typical developer
workstation).
Python
On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 13:25 -0700, Chris Rebert wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Sam Ettessoc sami...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to share a benchmark I did. The computer used was a
2160MHz Intel Core Duo w/ 2000MB of 667MHz DDR2 SDRAM running MAC OS
10.5.6 and a lots of software
On Mar 12, 2009, at 4:20 PM, Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
Even more amazingly, it takes approximately 30% less time to say
'ruby' than to say 'python'!!!
But python scores 55% more points than ruby in Scrabble, so that's
understandable. It also explains why both languages are much better
In article tnkdnwbnsloy8stunz2dnuvz_j2wn...@posted.visi,
Grant Edwards inva...@invalid wrote:
On 2009-03-12, Sam Ettessoc sami...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear sir,
[Rather odd benchmark troll elided.]
Looks more like humor than a troll...
--
Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com) *
Daniel Fetchinson fetchin...@googlemail.com writes:
Even more amazingly, it takes approximately 30% less time to say
'ruby' than to say 'python'!!!
That is not a fair comparison. Python has two more letters than
Ruby, so you are accomplishing more when you say it.
--
On 2009-03-12, Aahz a...@pythoncraft.com wrote:
In article tnkdnwbnsloy8stunz2dnuvz_j2wn...@posted.visi,
Grant Edwards inva...@invalid wrote:
On 2009-03-12, Sam Ettessoc sami...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear sir,
[Rather odd benchmark troll elided.]
Looks more like humor than a troll...
Upon
On Mar 13, 7:58 am, Paul Rubin http://phr...@nospam.invalid wrote:
Daniel Fetchinson fetchin...@googlemail.com writes:
Even more amazingly, it takes approximately 30% less time to say
'ruby' than to say 'python'!!!
That is not a fair comparison. Python has two more letters than
Ruby, so
Philip Semanchuk wrote:
On Mar 12, 2009, at 4:20 PM, Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
Even more amazingly, it takes approximately 30% less time to say
'ruby' than to say 'python'!!!
But python scores 55% more points than ruby in Scrabble, so that's
understandable. It also explains why both
In the system that I tested, results were different.
*
System was
CPU: AMD Phenom(tm) 9950 Quad-Core Processor, Frequency 2600MHz, L2
cache 512KB
Memory 3164MB
OS: Ubuntu 8.10
When I tried this benchmark for the first time,
i...@pc:~$ time python bench.py
real0m0.010s
user
Martin P. Hellwig wrote:
Philip Semanchuk wrote:
On Mar 12, 2009, at 4:20 PM, Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
Even more amazingly, it takes approximately 30% less time to say
'ruby' than to say 'python'!!!
But python scores 55% more points than ruby in Scrabble, so that's
understandable. It
14 matches
Mail list logo
