I've read that it is possible to compile jython to native code using
GCJ. PyLucene uses this approach, they then use SWIG to create a Python
wrapper around the natively compiled (java) Lucene. Has this been done
before for with jython?
Another approach would be to use JPype to call the jython
TB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there an elegant way to assign to a list from a list of unknown
size? For example, how could you do something like:
a, b, c = (line.split(':'))
if line could have less than three fields?
import itertools as it
a, b, c = it.islice(
it.chain(
Dave Benjamin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can we get a show of hands for all of those who have written or are
currently maintaining code that uses the leaky listcomp feature?
Have written: guilty -- basically to show how NOT to do things.
Currently maintaining: you _gotta_ be kidding!-)
I
Fredrik Lundh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
or (readable):
if len(list) n:
list.extend((n - len(list)) * [item])
I find it just as readable without the redundant if guard -- just:
alist.extend((n - len(alist)) * [item])
of course, this guard-less version depends on N*[x]
Kamilche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want my program to be able to reload its code dynamically. I have a
large hierarchy of objects in memory. The inheritance hierarchy of
these objects are scattered over several files.
Michael Hudson has a nice custom metaclass for that in Activestate's
Paul McGuire wrote:
Is there an elegant way to assign to a list from a list of unknown
size? For example, how could you do something like:
a, b, c = (line.split(':'))
if line could have less than three fields?
I asked a very similar question a few weeks ago, and from the various
Francis Girard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
But besides the fact that generators are either produced with the new yield
reserved word or by defining the __new__ method in a class definition, I
don't know much about them.
Having __new__ in a class definition has nothing much to do with
Super Sorry for the extra traffic. ;-)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
5. Several builtin functions return iterators rather than lists, specifically
xrange(), enumerate() and reversed(). Other builtins that yield sequences
(range(), sorted(), zip()) return lists.
Yes for enumerate and reversed, no for xrange:
xx=xrange(7)
Peter Otten wrote:
Paul McGuire wrote:
Is there an elegant way to assign to a list from a list of unknown
size? For example, how could you do something like:
a, b, c = (line.split(':'))
if line could have less than three fields?
I asked a very similar question a few weeks ago, and
Paul Rubin http wrote:
Here's the message I had in mind:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/msg/adfbec9f4d7300cc
It came from someone who follows Python crypto issues as closely as
anyone, and refers to a consensus on python-dev. I'm not on python-dev
myself but I
On Sat, 2005-01-22 at 10:10 +0100, Alex Martelli wrote:
The answer for the current implementation, BTW, is in between -- some
buffering, but bounded consumption of memory -- but whether that tidbit
of pragmatics is part of the file specs, heh, that's anything but clear
(just as for other
Le samedi 22 Janvier 2005 10:10, Alex Martelli a crit:
Francis Girard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
But besides the fact that generators are either produced with the new
yield reserved word or by defining the __new__ method in a class
definition, I don't know much about them.
Having
On Sat, 2005-01-22 at 17:46 +0800, I wrote:
I'd be interested to know if there's a better solution to this than:
. inpath = '/tmp/msg.eml'
. infile = open(inpath)
. initer = iter(infile)
. headers = []
. for line in initer:
if not line.strip():
break
Alex Martelli wrote:
or (readable):
if len(list) n:
list.extend((n - len(list)) * [item])
I find it just as readable without the redundant if guard -- just:
alist.extend((n - len(alist)) * [item])
the guard makes it obvious what's going on, also for a reader that doesn't
André Roberge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
alex = CreateRobot()
anna = CreateRobot()
alex.move()
anna.move()
H -- while I've long since been identified as a 'bot, I can assure
you that my wife Anna isn't!
Alex
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
TB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there an elegant way to assign to a list from a list of unknown
size? For example, how could you do something like:
a, b, c = (line.split(':'))
if line could have less than three fields?
You could use this old trick...
a, b, c =
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 20:23:58 -0500, Mike C. Fletcher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:24:12 -, Mark English [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to write a Tkinter app which, given a class, pops up a
window(s) with fields for each attribute of that class. The user could
For some reason, I am having the hardest time doing something that should
be obvious. (Note time of posting ;)
Given an arbitrary string, I want to find each individual instance of
text in the form: [PROMPT:optional text]
I tried this:
y=re.compile(r'\[PROMPT:.*\]')
Which works fine when the
Francis Girard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
A 'def' of a function whose body uses 'yield', and in 2.4 the new genexp
construct.
Ok. I guess I'll have to update to version 2.4 (from 2.3) to follow the
discussion.
It's worth upgrading even just for the extra speed;-).
Since you
Pierre Quentel wrote:
Bonjour,
I am developing an application and I have a configuration file with a
lot of comments to help the application users understand what the
options mean
I would like it to be editable, through a web browser or a GUI
application. With ConfigParser I can read the
Fredrik Lundh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alex Martelli wrote:
or (readable):
if len(list) n:
list.extend((n - len(list)) * [item])
I find it just as readable without the redundant if guard -- just:
alist.extend((n - len(alist)) * [item])
the guard makes it
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Given an arbitrary string, I want to find each individual instance of
text in the form: [PROMPT:optional text]
I tried this:
y=re.compile(r'\[PROMPT:.*\]')
Which works fine when the text is exactly [PROMPT:whatever]
didn't you leave something out here? compile
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
I tried this:
y=re.compile(r'\[PROMPT:.*\]')
Which works fine when the text is exactly [PROMPT:whatever] but
does not match on:
something [PROMPT:foo] something [PROMPT:bar] something ...
The overall goal is to identify the beginning and end of each
Craig Ringer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
. data = ''.join(x for x in infile)
Maybe ''.join(infile) is a better way to express this functionality?
Avoids 2.4 dependency and should be faster as well as more concise.
Might it be worth providing a way to have file objects seek back to the
current
Diez B. Roggisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nick Coghlan wrote:
If this only has to work for classes created for the purpose (rather than
for an arbitrary class):
Certainly a step into the direction I meant - but still missing type
declarations. And that's what at least I'd like to see
Nick Craig-Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Or this version if you want something other than as the default
a, b, b = (line.split(':') + 3*[None])[:3]
Either you mean a, b, c -- or you're being subtler than I'm grasping.
BTW This is a feature I miss from perl...
Hmmm, I understand
Hi Luigi Ballabio,
Thankyou very much for your reply,
it worked well.
Kishore.
Luigi Ballabio wrote:
At 10:37 AM 10/19/01 +0200, anthony harel wrote:
Is it possible to make dynamic call of a function whith python ?
I have got a string that contains the name of the function I
want to call
On Sat, 2005-01-22 at 12:20 +0100, Alex Martelli wrote:
Craig Ringer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
. data = ''.join(x for x in infile)
Maybe ''.join(infile) is a better way to express this functionality?
Avoids 2.4 dependency and should be faster as well as more concise.
Thanks - for some
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
# Python
# to open a file and write to file
# do
f=open('xfile.txt','w')
# this creates a file object and name it f.
# the second argument of open can be
# 'w' for write (overwrite exsiting file)
# 'a' for append (ditto)
# 'r' or read only
# to actually print to file
Simon Brunning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
is there a faster way to build a circular iterator in python that by
doing this:
c=['r','g','b','c','m','y','k']
for i in range(30):
print c[i%len(c)]
I don''t know if it's faster, but:
import itertools
On 21 Jan 2005 11:13:20 -0800, Johnny Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks everyone for the replies!
John Hunter, yep, this is Johnny Lin in geosci :).
re using return: the problem i have is somewhere in my code there's a
memory leak. i realize return is supposed to unbind all the local
Dave Benjamin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can we get a show of hands for all of those who have written or are
currently maintaining code that uses the leaky listcomp feature?
It's really irrelevant whether anyone is using a feature or not. If
the feature is documented as being available, it
Jeremy Bowers wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 21:01:00 -0400, André Roberge wrote:
etc. Since I want the user to learn Python's syntax, I don't want
to
require him/her to write
alex = CreateRobot(name = 'alex')
to then be able to do
alex.move()
This is just my opinion, but I've been
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex Martelli) writes:
If it changed the semantics of for-loops in general, that would be quite
inconvenient to me -- once in a while I do rely on Python's semantics
(maintaining the loop control variable after a break; I don't recall if
I ever used the fact that the
Paul Rubin wrote:
Some languages let you say things like:
for (var x = 0; x 10; x++)
do_something(x);
and that limits the scope of x to the for loop.
depending on the compiler version, compiler switches, IDE settings, etc.
/F
--
Nick Craig-Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, unfortunately; the python-dev consensus was that encryption raised
export control issues, and the existing rotor module is now on its way to
being removed.
I'm sure thats wrong now-a-days. Here are some examples of open
source software with
Fredrik Lundh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Some languages let you say things like:
for (var x = 0; x 10; x++)
do_something(x);
and that limits the scope of x to the for loop.
depending on the compiler version, compiler switches, IDE settings, etc.
Huh? I'm not sure what you're
Xah Lee wrote:
# the second argument of open can be
# 'w' for write (overwrite exsiting file)
# 'a' for append (ditto)
# 'r' or read only
are you sure you didn't forget something?
# reading the one line
# line = f.realine()
wrong
[...]
Maybe you didn't get the fact the you won't see a
Paul Rubin http://[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex Martelli) writes:
If it changed the semantics of for-loops in general, that would be quite
inconvenient to me -- once in a while I do rely on Python's semantics
(maintaining the loop control variable after a break; I don't
Paul Rubin http://[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Benjamin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can we get a show of hands for all of those who have written or are
currently maintaining code that uses the leaky listcomp feature?
It's really irrelevant whether anyone is using a feature or not. If
the
Paul Rubin wrote:
Some languages let you say things like:
for (var x = 0; x 10; x++)
do_something(x);
and that limits the scope of x to the for loop.
depending on the compiler version, compiler switches, IDE settings, etc.
Huh? I'm not sure what you're talking about.
guess
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 17:04:11 -0800, Jeff Shannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TB wrote:
Hi,
Is there an elegant way to assign to a list from a list of unknown
size? For example, how could you do something like:
a, b, c = (line.split(':'))
if line could have less than three fields?
Reinhold Birkenfeld wrote:
Agreed. If you just want to use it, you don't need the spec anyway.
but the guy who wrote the parser you're using had to read it, and understand it.
judging from the number of crash reports you see in this thread, chances are
that
he didn't.
/F
--
Paul Rubin wrote:
Martin, do you know more about this? I remember being disappointed
about the decisions since I had done some work on a new block cipher
API and I had wanted to submit an implementation to the distro. But
when I heard there was no hope of including it, I stopped working on
On 21 Jan 2005 20:32:46 -0800, Paul Rubin
http://[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course in that case, since the absence of lexical scope was a wart
in its own right, fixing it had to have been on the radar. So turning
the persistent listcomp loop var into a documented feature, instead of
describing
Bengt Richter wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:04:10 -0600, A.M. Kuchling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 18:30:47 +0100,
rm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nowadays, people are trying to create binary XML, XML databases,
graphics in XML (btw, I'm quite impressed by SVG), you have XSLT,
A.M. Kuchling [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It was discussed in this thread:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-April/034959.html
Guido and M.-A. Lemburg were leaning against including crypto; everyone else
was positive. But Guido's the BDFL, so I interpreted his vote as being the
Fredrik Lundh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
in some early C++ compilers, the scope for x was limited to the scope
containing the for loop, not the for loop itself. some commercial
compilers
still default to that behaviour.
Indeed--and the standards committee
Paul Rubin http://[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's really irrelevant whether anyone is using a feature or not. If
the feature is documented as being available, it means that removing
it is an incompatible change that can break existing code which
currently
Andrew Koenig [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In this case, I think the right solution to the problem is two-fold:
1) from __future__ import lexical_comprehensions
2) If you don't import the feature, and you write a program that depends
on a list-comprehension variable remaining in
Paul Rubin http://[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's not obvious to me how the compiler can tell. Consider:
x = 3
if frob():
frobbed = True
squares = [x*x for x in range(9)]
if blob():
z = x
Should the compiler issue a warning
Kamilche wrote:
I want my program to be able to reload its code dynamically. I have a
large hierarchy of objects in memory. The inheritance hierarchy of
these objects are scattered over several files.
Michael Spencer wrote:
An alternative approach (with some pros and cons) is to modify the class
Andrew Koenig [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually, I don't think so. If you intend for it to be impossible for z =
x to refer to the x in the list comprehension, you shouldn't mind putting
in from __future__ import lexical_comprehensions. If you don't intend for
it to be impossible, then
Andr Roberge wrote:
Craig Ringer wrote:
On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 16:13 -0800, Andr wrote:
Short version of what I am looking for:
Given a class public_class which is instantiated a few times e.g.
a = public_class()
b = public_class()
c = public_class()
I would like to find out the name of the
Rick == rick [EMAIL PROTECTED] com [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Rick I was wondering whether anyone could recommend a good C++
Rick book, with good being defined from the perspective of a
Rick Python programmer. I
A good C++ book from the perspective of a Python programmer would be
one
Thanks. I'm just trying to see if there is some concise syntax available
without getting into obscurity. As for my purpose Siegmund's suggestion
works quite well.
The few forms you have suggested works. But as they refer to list multiple
times, it need a separate assignment statement like
Paul Rubin wrote:
2. Would anyone except me have any use for this? shows a lack of
understanding of how Python is used. Some users (call them
application users or AU's) use Python to run Python applications for
whatever purpose. Some other users (call them developers) use
Python to develop
Bengt Richter wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 20:23:58 -0500, Mike C. Fletcher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:24:12 -, Mark English [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Does the BasicProperty base class effectively register itself as an observer
of subclass properties and
Jim Hargrave wrote:
I've read that it is possible to compile jython to native code using
GCJ. PyLucene uses this approach, they then use SWIG to create a Python
wrapper around the natively compiled (java) Lucene. Has this been done
before for with jython?
Another approach would be to use JPype
Fredrik Lundh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
lack of understanding of how Python is used
wonderful. I'm going to make a poster of your post, and put it on my
office wall.
Excellent. I hope you will re-read it several times a day. Doing
that might improve your attitude.
--
Paul Rubin wrote:
Excellent. I hope you will re-read it several times a day. Doing
that might improve your attitude.
you really don't have a fucking clue about anything, do you?
/F
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
A.M. Kuchling wrote:
IMHO that's a bit extreme. Specifications are written to be detailed, so
consequently they're torture to read. Seen the ReStructured Text spec
lately?
I've read many specs; YAML (both the spec and the format) is easily
among the worst ten-or-so specs
Alex Martelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nick Craig-Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Or this version if you want something other than as the default
a, b, b = (line.split(':') + 3*[None])[:3]
Either you mean a, b, c -- or you're being subtler than I'm
grasping.
Just a typo -
Doug Holton wrote:
What do you expect? YAML is designed for humans to use, XML is not.
YAML also hasn't had the backing and huge community behind it like XML.
XML sucks for people to have to write in, but is straightforward to
parse. The consequence is hordes of invalid XML files, leading to
Alex Martelli wrote:
[explanation and the following code:]
a, b, c = it.islice(
... it.chain(
... line.split(':'),
... it.repeat(some_default),
... ),
... 3)
...
...
def pad_with_default(N, iterable,
Michael Spencer wrote:
Alex Martelli wrote:
[explanation and the following code:]
a, b, c = it.islice(
... it.chain(
... line.split(':'),
... it.repeat(some_default),
... ),
... 3)
...
...
rm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
100% right on, stuff (like this)? should be easy on the users, and if
possible, on the developers,
not the other way around.
I guess you both stopped reading before you got to the second paragraph
in my post. YAML (at least the version described in that spec)
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
rm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
100% right on, stuff (like this)? should be easy on the users, and if possible, on the developers,
not the other way around.
I guess you both stopped reading before you got to the second paragraph
in my post. YAML (at least the version described
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
and trust me, when things are hard to get right for developers, users will
suffer too.
That is exactly why YAML can be improved. But XML proves that getting
it right for developers has little to do with getting it right for
users (or for saving bandwidth). What's right for
rm wrote:
this implementation of their idea. But I'd love to see a generic,
pythonic data format.
That's a good idea. But really Python is already close to that. A lot
of times it is easier to just write out a python dictionary than using a
DB or XML or whatever. Python is already close to
Fredrik Lundh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Excellent. I hope you will re-read it several times a day. Doing
that might improve your attitude.
you really don't have a fucking clue about anything, do you?
You're not making any bloody sense. I explained to you why I wasn't
interested in
rm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
furthermore, users will suffer too, I'm suffering if I have to use C++,
with all its exceptions
and special cases.
and when you suffer, your users will suffer. in the C++ case, they're likely to
suffer from spurious program crashes, massively delayed development
Doug Holton wrote:
What do you expect? YAML is designed for humans to use, XML is not.
YAML also hasn't had the backing and huge community behind it like XML.
XML sucks for people to have to write in, but is straightforward to
parse. The consequence is hordes of invalid XML files, leading to
Branden Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am a teaching assistant for an introductory course at Georgia Tech
which uses Python, and I have a student who has been unable to start
IDLE on her Windows XP Home Edition machine. Clicking on the shortcut
(or the program executable) causes
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bob Smith wrote:
Are these the same:
1. f_size = os.path.getsize(file_name)
2. fp1 = file(file_name, 'r')
data = fp1.readlines()
last_byte = fp1.tell()
I always get the same value when doing 1. or 2. Is there a reason I
should do both? When reading to
Daniel Bickett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In my (brief) experience with YAML, it seemed like there were several
different ways of doing things, and I saw this as one of it's failures
(since we're all comparing it to XML).
YAML looks to me to be completely insane, even compared to Python
lists.
Steve Holden wrote:
It seems to me the misunderstanding here is that XML was ever intended
to be generated directly by typing in a text editor. It was rather
intended (unless I'm mistaken) as a process-to-process data interchange
metalanguage that would be *human_readable*.
The premise that XML
Doug Holton wrote:
rm wrote:
this implementation of their idea. But I'd love to see a generic,
pythonic data format.
That's a good idea. But really Python is already close to that. A lot
of times it is easier to just write out a python dictionary than using a
DB or XML or whatever. Python
Stephen Waterbury wrote:
The premise that XML had a coherent design intent
stetches my credulity beyond its elastic limit.
the design goals are listed in section 1.1 of the specification.
see tim bray's annotated spec for additional comments by one
of the team members:
Paul Rubin http://[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
lists. I think it would be great if the Python library exposed an
interface for parsing constant list and dict expressions, e.g.:
[1, 2, 'Joe Smith', 8237972883334L, # comment
{'Favorite fruits': ['apple', 'banana', 'pear']}, #
Paul Rubin wrote:
YAML looks to me to be completely insane, even compared to Python
lists. I think it would be great if the Python library exposed an
interface for parsing constant list and dict expressions, e.g.:
[1, 2, 'Joe Smith', 8237972883334L, # comment
{'Favorite fruits':
Alex Martelli wrote:
[1, 2, 'Joe Smith', 8237972883334L, # comment
{'Favorite fruits': ['apple', 'banana', 'pear']}, # another comment
'xyzzy', [3, 5, [3.14159, 2.71828, [
I don't see what YAML accomplishes that something like the above wouldn't.
Note that all the
Hi,
I am trying to create a separate process that will launch python and
then can be used to step through a script programmatically.
I have tried something like:
(input, output) = os.popen2(cmd=python)
Then I expected I could select over the two handles input and output,
make sure they aren't
Paul Rubin http://phr.cx@NOSPAM.invalid writes:
[...]
Building larger ones seems to
have complexity exponential in the number of bits, which is not too
[...]
Why?
It's not even known in theory whether quantum computing is
possible on a significant scale.
Discuss. wink
(I don't mean I'm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex Martelli) writes:
I wonder, however, if, as an even toyer exercise, one might not
already do it easily -- by first checking each token (as generated by
tokenize.generate_tokens) to ensure it's safe, and THEN eval _iff_ no
unsafe tokens were found in the check.
I don't
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John J. Lee) writes:
Building larger ones seems to
have complexity exponential in the number of bits, which is not too
Why?
The way I understand it, that 7-qubit computer was based on embedding
the qubits on atoms in a large molecule, then running the computation
://members.dca.net/mhoffman/sensors/python/20050122/
[2] http://archives.andrew.net.au/lm-sensors/msg28792.html
[3] http://www2.lm-sensors.nu/~lm78/cvs/lm_sensors2/doc/useful_addresses.html
Thanks and regards,
--
Mark M. Hoffman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Xah Lee wrote:
# reading entire file as a list, of lines
# mylist = f.readlines()
To do this efficiently on a large file (dozens or hundreds of megs), you
should use the 'sizehint' parameter so as not to use too much memory:
sizehint = 0
mylist = f.readlines(sizehint)
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I think that this must have something to do with python expecting
itself to by in a TTY? Can anyone give any idea of where I should be
going with this?
http://pexpect.sourceforge.net/
Alex
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Francis Girard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If I understand correctly,
Almost...
a generator produce something over which you can
iterate with the help of an iterator.
To be exact, the producer is a generator function, a function whose body
contains 'yield'.
Doug Holton wrote:
That is exactly why YAML can be improved. But XML proves that getting
it right for developers has little to do with getting it right for
users (or for saving bandwidth). What's right for developers is what
requires the least amount of work. The problem is, that's what
A.M. Kuchling [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It was discussed in this thread:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-April/034959.html
In that thread, you wrote:
Rubin wanted to come up with a nice interface for the module, and
has posted some notes toward it. I have an existing
Steven Bethard wrote:
If you have access to the user module's text, something like this
might
be a nicer solution:
py class Robot(object):
... def __init__(self):
... self.name = None
... def move(self):
... print robot %r moved % self.name
...
py class
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
Stephen Waterbury wrote:
The premise that XML had a coherent design intent
stetches my credulity beyond its elastic limit.
the design goals are listed in section 1.1 of the specification.
see tim bray's annotated spec for additional comments by one
of the team members:
Paul Rubin wrote:
you really don't have a fucking clue about anything, do you?
You're not making any bloody sense.
oh, I make perfect sense, and I think most people here understand why
I found your little lecture so funny. if you still don't get it, maybe some-
one can explain it to you.
/F
Hi Dear Python programmers,
I want to ask you a question about python scripting.I want to know if I can design web-pages with python or at least write html files with python. and if I write html files with python and some CGI scripts and upload them to the web-page .. does the people who view
Problems with XMLRPC
I have an xmlrpc server with a method called results() which returns an
XML
message.
I've been able to use this function without problems when I had only
one client talking to one server. I have recently introduced a P2P
aspect to this process and now I have servers calling
Paul Rubin said unto the world upon 2005-01-22 20:16:
Fredrik Lundh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You're not making any bloody sense.
oh, I make perfect sense, and I think most people here understand
why I found your little lecture so funny. if you still don't get
it, maybe some- one can explain it
As for using JPype ... well it depends on what you want to script. if
you Java code is the main app, I'd eschew CPython completely and use
Jython to script. If you main app is in Python, and the Java code is
simply libraries you wish to use, then I'f go with CPython + Jpype.
It
is very easy
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
