Hi all,
I am a python learner. I encountered a problem when i was testing the following
code. What is strange is that if I replace the object name with zhang, the
program would be ok. And if I replace the Person.population with
self.__class__.population, it will also be ok. So what is the matter
I updated my Python library:
https://github.com/CecilWesterhof/PythonLibrary/blob/master/utilDecebal.py
One of the additions is time_fetchURLs. A function to display the
needed time to receive a sequence of URLs from a server.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.
On Sunday 23 Aug 2015 16:03 CEST, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 11:18 PM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> Also an URL is unique, so I need to check that if it is found, the
>> values are the same as the ones I wanted to insert.
>
> And if they aren't? Currently, all you do is print ou
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> On Sunday 23 Aug 2015 16:03 CEST, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 11:18 PM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>>> Also an URL is unique, so I need to check that if it is found, the
>>> values are the same as the ones I wanted to in
On 2015-08-24 06:49, 344276105 wrote:
Hi all,
I am a python learner. I encountered a problem when i was testing the
following code. What is strange is that if I replace the object name
with zhang, the program would be ok. And if I replace the
Person.population with self.__class__.population, it w
On Saturday, August 22, 2015 at 11:58:30 PM UTC-4, Laura Creighton wrote:
> Ned Batchelder has researched this one quite a bit, see:
>
> see: http://nedbatchelder.com/blog/201206/eval_really_is_dangerous.html
> http://nedbatchelder.com/blog/201302/looking_for_python_3_builtins.html
> http://nedbat
Some people have tried to make a case that concurrent.futures should be adopted
as a replacement wherever greenlet based algorithms are in use. However, my
experience is that greenelts combined with concurrent.futures provides
significant advantages. In other words, to a degree the two approache
In Python2 urlopen is part of urllib, but in Python3 it is part of
urllib.request. I solved this by the following code:
from platform import python_version
if python_version()[0] < '3':
from urllib import urlope
On Monday, August 24, 2015 at 1:14:20 PM UTC-4, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> In Python2 urlopen is part of urllib, but in Python3 it is part of
> urllib.request. I solved this by the following code:
>
> from platform import pyth
On Monday 24 Aug 2015 19:37 CEST, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> On Monday, August 24, 2015 at 1:14:20 PM UTC-4, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> In Python2 urlopen is part of urllib, but in Python3 it is part of
>> urllib.request. I solved this by the following code:
>>
Hello,
I'm trying to retrieve the number of commits and changed files on all pull
requests submitted to a branch.
The call to get all the pull requests is GET /repos/:owner/:repo/pulls, but it
does not return "commits" or "changed_files".
The call that returns number of commits and changed fi
Hi,
Hope you are doing well !!!
My name is Siva and I'm a recruiter at TheAppliedthought , a global staffing
and IT consulting company.
Please find the below job description which may suits any of your consultants
who are available in market or who are looking for change, please send me
latest
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 1:14 PM, DBS wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to retrieve the number of commits and changed files on all pull
> requests submitted to a branch.
>
> The call to get all the pull requests is GET /repos/:owner/:repo/pulls, but
> it does not return "commits" or "changed_files".
On Monday, August 24, 2015 at 2:16:55 PM UTC-7, Chris Rebert wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 1:14 PM, DBS wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm trying to retrieve the number of commits and changed files on all pull
> > requests submitted to a branch.
> >
> > The call to get all the pull requests is GET
On 23.08.2015 23:43, Charles Hixson wrote:
If I understand correctly asyncio, coroutines, etc. (and, of course,
Threads) are not simultaneously executed, and that if one wants that
one must still use multiprocessing. But I'm not sure. The note is
still there at the start of threading, so I'm p
Is your #BI implementation ready to scale up for ALL of your future
requirements? https://lnkd.in/ezeGr9b
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
16 matches
Mail list logo
