Fwd: Re: Progress migrating cffi and pycparser to libclang

2018-01-05 Thread Etienne Robillard
Forwarding  this thread to the CFFI developers... Re Paul: Thanks for your feedback. My intended audience are developers who can use hg to fetch/build source code without pip. Best regards, Etienne Message transféré Sujet : Re: Progress migrating cffi and pycparse

sendline buffer

2018-01-05 Thread Iranna Mathapati
Hi Team, I have faced fallowing issue:: dev.sendline("*show version*") <<< its printing "show version output" dev.sendline("*show module*") <<< its printing "shoe module output" *Runing again* dev.sendline("show veriosn") <<< its runing 2nd time again dev.before *output is no

Re: Linux/Windows GUI programming: GUI-fy a CLI using pyInstaller

2018-01-05 Thread Kevin Walzer
On 1/1/18 11:45 AM, X. wrote: Ulli Horlacher: I have to transfer a python 2.7 CLI programm into one with a (simple) GUI. The program must run on Linux and Windows and must be compilable with pyinstall, because I have to ship a standalone windows.exe Any kind of installer is not acceptable. Read

Re: Re: Progress migrating cffi and pycparser to libclang

2018-01-05 Thread Armin Rigo
Hi Etienne, On 5 January 2018 at 10:15, Etienne Robillard wrote: > Forwarding this thread to the CFFI developers... > If you're asking whether we could add libclang as a dependency to CFFI, the answer is no, sorry. I feel that I've already explained exactly this to you several times in private

Re: has sourceforge exposed the dirty little secret ?

2018-01-05 Thread Ian Kelly
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 9:27 AM, Kim of K. wrote: > > "Background > > We feel that the world still produces way too much software that is > frankly substandard. The reasons for this are pretty simple: software > producers do not pay enough attention [...]" > > > quote from http://texttest.sourcefor

Re: has sourceforge exposed the dirty little secret ?

2018-01-05 Thread Larry Martell
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 11:27 AM, Kim of K. wrote: > > "Background > > We feel that the world still produces way too much software that is > frankly substandard. The reasons for this are pretty simple: software > producers do not pay enough attention [...]" > > > quote from http://texttest.sourcefo

Re: has sourceforge exposed the dirty little secret ?

2018-01-05 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2018-01-05, Kim of K. wrote: > In other words: most sites like SF and github offer tons of crap. > download and break is the overwhelming theme here. > > why is no one complaining ? Because complaining doesn't have any effect? If you care, shut up and fix something. -- Grant Edwards

Re: has sourceforge exposed the dirty little secret ?

2018-01-05 Thread John Gordon
In <15151695.348096.18338899180412170014@welt.netz> "Kim of K." writes: > In other words: most sites like SF and github offer tons of crap. > download and break is the overwhelming theme here. > why is no one complaining ? 90% of everything is crap. Why should software be any differe

Re: has sourceforge exposed the dirty little secret ?

2018-01-05 Thread John Gordon
In <151517608506.368831.5093080329614058603@welt.netz> "Kim of K." writes: > print(emo('now you see emos')) > OF COURSE THIS SHIT DOES NOT WORK. What device did you run this on? Your average terminal window isn't going to support emojis... -- John Gordon A is for Amy, w

Re: has sourceforge exposed the dirty little secret ?

2018-01-05 Thread Chris Angelico
On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 6:02 AM, John Gordon wrote: > In <151517608506.368831.5093080329614058603@welt.netz> "Kim of K." > writes: > >> print(emo('now you see emos')) >> OF COURSE THIS SHIT DOES NOT WORK. > > What device did you run this on? Your average terminal window isn't > going to supp

Re: has sourceforge exposed the dirty little secret ?

2018-01-05 Thread Igor Korot
Hi, On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 12:58 PM, John Gordon wrote: > In <15151695.348096.18338899180412170014@welt.netz> "Kim of K." > writes: > > >> In other words: most sites like SF and github offer tons of crap. >> download and break is the overwhelming theme here. > >> why is no one complaini

Re: has sourceforge exposed the dirty little secret ?

2018-01-05 Thread Igor Korot
Hi, On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Kim of K. wrote: > Igor Korot wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 12:58 PM, John Gordon wrote: >>> In <15151695.348096.18338899180412170014@welt.netz> "Kim of K." >>> writes: >>> >>> In other words: most sites like SF and github offer t

[OT] Re: has sourceforge exposed the dirty little secret ?

2018-01-05 Thread Michael Torrie
On 01/05/2018 10:56 AM, Kim of K. wrote: > wow! Yup that's what I said when I read your ramblings. > even you are defensive about publishing non-working garbage. Absolutely. You have absolutely no right to make demands of any of the folks who toss their half-baked personal projects up on source

Re: is comp.lang.python still the pinnacle of the py community ?

2018-01-05 Thread Ian Kelly
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 2:06 PM, Kim of K. wrote: > > post frequency is down to a precarious level It's true that compared to ten years ago, the quantity of posts here has diminished by a significant fraction, maybe even by an order of magnitude. This is still a great place for discussion however,

Re: is comp.lang.python still the pinnacle of the py community ?

2018-01-05 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 05 January 2018 16:06:34 Kim of K. wrote: > post frequency is down to a precarious level Thats because the huge majority of us who are here to learn a tidbit here and there, shove that stuff off to a spamassassin training directory, where its studied by sa-learn --spam for a second or

Native object exposing buffer protocol

2018-01-05 Thread Rob Gaddi
I'd like to create a native Python object that exposes the buffer protocol. Basically, something with a ._data member which is a bytearray that I can still readinto, make directly into a numpy array, etc. I can do it by inheriting the entire thing from bytearray directly, but that gives me a

Python Inheritance Terminology

2018-01-05 Thread Irv Kalb
I'm doing some writing for an upcoming course on OOP using Python. I have been doing OOP programming for many years in many different languages, and I want make sure that I'm using the appropriate terminology in Python. I'd like to know if there are "official" or even standard terms that are

Re: Native object exposing buffer protocol

2018-01-05 Thread breamoreboy
On Saturday, January 6, 2018 at 12:02:18 AM UTC, Rob Gaddi wrote: > I'd like to create a native Python object that exposes the buffer > protocol. Basically, something with a ._data member which is a > bytearray that I can still readinto, make directly into a numpy array, etc. > > I can do it by

Re: Native object exposing buffer protocol

2018-01-05 Thread Ben Finney via Python-list
Rob Gaddi writes: > I'd like to create a native Python object that exposes the buffer > protocol. Basically, something with a ._data member which is a > bytearray that I can still readinto, make directly into a numpy array, > etc. The “etc.” seems pretty important, there. You want the behaviour

Re: Python Inheritance Terminology

2018-01-05 Thread Ben Finney
Irv Kalb writes: > I'm doing some writing for an upcoming course on OOP using Python. Welcome, and congratulations for using Python in this work. > I'd like to know if there are "official" or even standard terms that > are used to describe a class that is inherited from, and the class > that

Re: has sourceforge exposed the dirty little secret ?

2018-01-05 Thread Richard Damon
On 1/5/18 3:11 PM, Kim of K. wrote: let me tell you... Once you're done with that school crap, you realize it was the pefect waste of time. At work or in life you need less than 2% of that school crap they funnelled into your head. My experience is that while I found little use for much of